Consensus Interferon + IFN Gamma in PegIFN/RBV
Non-Responders
|
| |
| |
Reported by Jules Levin
DDW, Chicago, May 2005
"Response of Chronic Hepatitis C PEG IFN-alpha-2 + Ribavirin
Nonresponders to Treatment with IFN Alfacon-1 (15 µg) and IFN Gamma-1b
(50 µg)"
Carroll Leevy1, Chris Chalmers2, Lawrence M. Blatt2 1The New Jersey
School of Dentistry and Medicine, Newark, New Jersey 2InterMune, Inc.,
Brisbane, CA
Leevy & Intermune reported these study results & information in a poster
at DDW.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: The elimination of serum HCV RNA following IFN-based
therapies displays biphasic kinetics with the first order attributed to
the direct antiviral effects of IFN-a and the second order attributed to
an immune-mediated clearance of infected cells by induction of TH1
cytokines, primarily IFN-£^ (gamma). Patients who have not had >=2 log10
reduction in serum HCV RNA by wk 12 have a 97–100% chance of not
responding.
It has been demonstrated that antiviral effects and TH1 responses are
enhanced by combining IFN-£^ (gamma) and IFN-a in in vitro systems.
Given these data, we conducted a retrospective study of nonresponders to
PEG IFN-a-2 + ribavirin (RBV) who were re-treated with IFN alfacon-1 and
IFN-£^ (gamma)1b without RBV.
Methods: All patients (N = 50) received PEG IFN-£\-2 and RBV for 12 wk
and did not achieve ≥2 log10 drop in HCV RNA. With no washout, patients
were retreated with IFN alfacon-1 15 µg SQ daily, and IFN-£^ (gamma)1b
50 µg SQ TIW for 48 wk. Serum HCV RNA was assessed at wk 8, 12, 24, 48 (EOT),
and 60 (12 wk posttreatment) to determine virologic response on- and
off-treatment. Serum HCV RNA was also assessed at wk 72 to determine SVR.
Consecutive patients from one institution with chronic HCV infection who
did not respond to PEG IFN-£\-2/RBV therapy and who agreed to undergo a
course of therapy with IFN alfacon-1/IFN-£^ (gamma) 1b.
Results: Virologic responses are shown below (Amplicore qualitative
assay, Roche Diagnostics):
34% (17/50) SVR
36% (18/50) at week 60 (12 wk post treatment)
48 weeks End of treatment response: 46% (23/50)
week 8: 36% (18/50)
week 12: 40% (20/50)
week 24: 46% (23/50)

One patient interrupted therapy due to constitutional symptoms while
all others tolerated therapy well. By wk 48, 13 patients (26%) required
filgrastim for reductions in ANC to below 0.75x109/L. After 12 wk of PEG
IFN-a-2 and RBV therapy the mean hemoglobin level was 11.6 °” 0.7 g/dL.
By wk 8 all IFN alfacon-1 and IFN-gamma 1b patients recovered hemoglobin
levels to normal with no use of erythopoeitin.
Only one patient had dosing temporarily interrupted; there were no dose
reductions for other patients.
Reductions in ANC were well controlled with filgrastim.
Conclusions: Retreatment of PEG IFN-a-2 + RBV nonresponders with the
combination of IFN alfacon-1 and IFN-£^ (gamma) 1b is well tolerated,
and analysis of posttreatment virologic response suggests that this
treatment may be of potential benefit in these difficult-to-treat
patients. This combination did not interfere with hemoglobin recovery,
indicating a differential safety profile with respect to RBV-containing
regimens. Hemoglobin levels returned to normal during treatment. A
larger, dose-finding study of the combination of IFN alfacon-1 and IFN-£^
(gamma) 1b is ongoing.
Graph. Quantitative changes in mean HCV RNA (copies/mL) after treatment
with IFN alfacon-1 + IFN-£^ 1b in this retrospective analysis (N = 50)

In contrast to previous reports of IFN-a–containing regimens, the
combination of IFN alfacon-1 + IFN-gamma 1b therapy led to prolonged
viral suppression in all patients after cessation of therapy (P < 0.01,
t-test).
Graph. Quantitative changes in HCV RNA (log10 copies/mL) after treatment
with IFN alfacon-1 + IFN-gamma 1b in patients who did not clear virus by
end of treatment (N = 27)

There was a statistically significant reduction in HCV RNA
concentration from baseline to end of observation (P < 0.001, t-test).
The mean at baseline was 6.47 ± 0.41 compared with the mean at Week 72,
which was 5.04 ± 0.88).
STUDY OBJECTIVE
This retrospective case series examined the safety and efficacy of
re-treating patients who did not respond to PEG IFN-a-2 + RBV therapy
with a combination of a bioengineered type I IFN (IFN alfacon-1) and a
recombinant type II IFN (IFN-£^ (gamma) 1b).
RATIONALE
• Chronic hepatitis C is a disease of T-cell hyporesponsiveness
• Clearance of acute HCV infection requires a potent TH1 response
mediated by production of IFN-gamma-4
• Clearance of HCV in chronically infected patients treated with IFN-a
requires a shift from a dominant TH2 to a TH1 response (mediated by IFN-gamma)
• IFN-gamma 1b and IFN alfacon-1 display synergistic antiviral activity
when combined in vitro5
Combining type I and type II interferons holds promise for the treatment
of chronic HCV:
INTRODUCTION
Current treatment of chronic hepatitis C is problematic:
--PEG IFN-a-2 and RBV is effective in ~50% of treatment-naïve
patients1,2
--Retreatment of patients who fail Rebetron therapy with PEG IFN-a-2 is
effective in only 4-12% of patients3 (some studies show slightly higher
rates of SVR after re-treatment (e.g. 19%+ in Pegasys Canadian EAP).
--Side-effect profile of combination therapies is significant HCV
patients who
do not respond to treatment with PEG IFN-a-2 + RBV are a growing public
health concern.
IFN alfacon-1 (Consensus Interferon, Infergen)
• Type I interferon
• Approved for the treatment of HCV
• Binds and signals through type I receptor
• Bioengineered: consists of the most common amino acids in naturally
occurring IFN-£\ subtypes
• 10- to 100-fold higher biological potency in vitro compared with IFN-£\-2b/2a6
• Promising data in PEG IFN-a-2/ RBV nonresponders7
IFN-£^ (gamma)1b
• Type II interferon
• Approved for the treatment of chronic granulomatous disease and
osteopetrosis
• Binds and signals through type II receptor
• Has a spectrum of biologic effects
- Antiviral
- TH1 cytokine
- Antiproliferative
- Immunomodulatory
SAFETY
Hemoglobin levels in all patients returned to within normal range while
patients were receiving IFN alfacon-1 and IFN-£^ 1b. No growth factors
were used.
Graph. Hemoglobin recovery in patients receiving IFN alfacon-1 (15 µ}g
daily) + IFN-£^ 1b (50 µ}g TIW) after failing to respond to treatment
with PEG IFN-a-2 + RBV (N = 50)

Patients had rapid reduction in ALT after initiation of therapy.
Graph. Reductions in serum ALT in patients receiving IFN alfacon-1 (15
µ}g daily) + IFN-£^ 1b (50 µ}g TIW) (N = 50)

14 patients (28%) had reductions in WBC (ANC < 0.75 x 109) that
required use of G-CSF.
• Dosing was temporarily interrupted for one patient; there were no
dosing reductions for other patients
• Neutropenia was manageable with G-CSF and did not require dose
reductions
graph. Changes in ANC after treatment with IFN alfacon-1 + IFN-£^
(gamma) 1b (N = 50)

References
1 Fried M, et al. 2001. Pegylated (40kDa) Interferon Alfa-2a (PEGASYS)
in Combination With Ribavirin: Effi cacy And Safety Results From a Phase
III, Randomized, Actively Controlled, Multicenter Study.
Gastroenterology. 2001;120, A-55.
2 Manns MP, et al. Peginterferon alfa-2b plus ribavirin compared with
interferon alfa-2b plus ribavirin for initial treatment of chronic
hepatitis c: A randomised trial. Lancet. 2001;358:958-965.
3 Shiffman ML, et al. Retreatment of chronic hepatitis C virus infection
in patients who failed to achieve sustained virologic response. Minerva
Gastroenterol Dietol. 2004;50(1):37-49.
4 Thimme R, et al. Viral and immunological determinants of hepatitis C
virus clearance, persistence, and disease. Proc Nat Acad Sci.
2002;99:15661-15668.
5 Blatt LM, et al. Synergistic Effects of Type 1 (Infergen) and Type 2 (Actimmune)
Interferons in Preclinical Models of HCV: Demonstration of Potential
Efficacy. Hepatology. 2003;38 (Suppl 1):80A (AASLD 2003).
6 Blatt LM, et al. The Biologic Activity and Molecular Characterization
of a Novel Synthetic Interferon-Alpha Species, Consensus Interferon. J
Interferon Cytokine Res 1996;16:489-499.
7 Kaiser S, et al. Successful retreatment of peginterferon nonresponder
patients with chronic hepatitis C with high dose consensus interferon
induction therapy. Gastroenterology. 2003;124(4-Suppl 1): pA-700.
8 Tong MJ, et al. Prediction of response during interferon alfa 2b
therapy in chronic hepatitis C patients using viral and biochemical
characteristics: a comparison. Hepatology. 1997;26(6):1640-1645.
|
http://www.natap.org/2005/ddw/ddw_15.htm
Does Retreatment with Interferon Alfacon (Infergen) Plus
Interferon Gamma (Actimmune) Benefit Nonresponders to Peginterferon Plus
Ribavirin?
The elimination of serum
HCV RNA following interferon (IFN)-based therapies displays biphasic
kinetics with the first order attributed to the direct antiviral effects of
IFN-alfa and the second order attributed to an immune-mediated clearance of
infected cells by induction of TH1 cytokines, primarily IFN-gamma.
Patients who have not had
>2 log10 reduction in serum HCV RNA
by wk 12 have a 97–100% chance of not responding.
The authors say they have
demonstrated in prior studies that antiviral effects and TH1
responses are enhanced by combining IFN-gamma and IFN-alfa in in vitro
systems.
Given these data, the
researchers conducted a retrospective study of
nonresponders to
PEG IFN-alfa-2 + ribavirin (RBV) who
were
re-treated
with
IFN alfacon-1 (Infergen) and IFN-gamma 1b (Actimmune)
without ribavirin.
All patients (N = 50)
received PEG IFN-alfa-2 and RBV for 12 wk and did not achieve >2 log10
drop in HCV RNA. With no washout, patients were retreated with IFN alfacon-1
15 microgram SQ daily, and IFN-gamma 1b 50 microgram SQ TIW for 48 wk.
Serum HCV RNA was
assessed at wk 8, 12, 24, 48 (EOT), and 60 (12 wk post-treatment) to
determine virologic response on- and off-treatment and will be assessed at
wk 72 to determine SVR.
Results
Virologic responses are
shown below (Amplicore qualitative assay, Roche Diagnostics):
|
Week |
8 |
12 |
24 |
48 (EOT) |
60|
(12 Wk Posttreatment) |
|
HCV RNA Negative %(N) |
36% (18/50) |
40% (20/50) |
46% (23/50) |
46% (23/50) |
35% (13/37) |
One patient interrupted
therapy due to constitutional symptoms while all others tolerated therapy
well. By wk 48, 13 patients (26%) required filgrastim
for reductions in ANC to below 0.75 X 109/L. After 12 wk
of PEG IFN-alfa-2 and RBV therapy the mean hemoglobin level was 11.6
± 0.7 g/dL. By wk 8 all of
IFN alfacon-1 and IFN-g
1b patients recovered hemoglobin levels to normal with no use of
erythopoeitin.
Conclusions
·
Retreatment
of PEG IFN-alfa-2 + RBV
nonresponders with the combination
of IFN alfacon-1 and IFN-gamma 1b is well tolerated, and preliminary
analysis of post-treatment virologic response suggests that this treatment
may be of potential benefit in these difficult-to-treat patients.
·
This
combination did not interfere with hemoglobin recovery, indicating a
differential safety profile with respect to RBV containing regimens.
·
Further
analysis will assess
SVR and a larger dose-finding study
of the combination of IFN alfacon-1 and IFN-gammag
1b is ongoing.
05/27/05
Reference
C Leevy, C
Chalmers and L M Blatt. Response Of Chronic Hepatitis C PEG IFN-2 +
Ribavirin Nonresponders To Treatment With IFN Alfacon-1 (15 Mcg) and IFN
Gamma-1b (50 Mcg). Abstract S1537. Digestive Disease Week 2005. May 14-19,
2005. Chicago, IL.
http://www.hivandhepatitis.com/2005icr/ddw2005/docs/hcv_052705_f.html
Interferon Alfacon-1 (Infergen) Alone or in Combination
with IFN Gamma-1b (Actimmune) Suppresses Replication of a PEG
IFN-Alfa-2b-resistant Hepatitis C Virus Replicon
Treatments for chronic
hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection employing
pegylated interferon (IFN) alfa 2 plus ribavirin
are successful in ~50% of all treated patients, suggesting that HCV
may evade the antiviral actions of contemporary IFN therapy and
demonstrating a need for more effective therapy application.
Researchers evaluated the
in vitro biochemical, antiviral response and anti-HCV efficacy imparted by
IFN-alfa-2a (Roferon A),
PEG IFN-á-2b (PegIntron),
consensus IFN (IFN alfacon-1; Infergen)
or a
combination of IFN alfacon-1 and IFN-gamma 1b
in cultured human hepatocytes or hepatoma cells that harbor genetically
distinct HCV RNA replicons with differential sensitivity to the antiviral
actions of IFN-alfa-2a.
IFNs were applied to
cultured cells using relevant dosing based upon the pharmacologic attainable
in vivo serum maximum (Cmax) IFN concentration. Gene expression
and antiviral properties were measured using protein and RNA quantification
assays.
Results
·
At Cmax
concentrations of each IFN, the researchers found that ISG56 and PKR,
interferon stimulated genes (ISGs) with demonstrated antiviral properties,
were maximally expressed following IFN alfacon-1 treatment.
·
Treatment
with IFN-alfa-2a or PEG IFN-alfa-2b resulted in the slower accumulation and
an overall lower level of ISG expression.
·
While
replication of an IFN-alfa-2a-sensitive HCV 1b subgenomic HCV replicon in
cultured hepatoma cells was equally suppressed by IFN alfacon-1,
IFN-alfa-2a, and PEG IFN-alfa-2b, only IFN alfacon-1 effectively suppressed
the replication of an IFN-alfa-2a–resistant HCV replicon variant at relevant
Cmax dosing.
·
When
combined with the therapeutically relevant Cmax dose of IFN-gamma
1b, IFN alfacon-1 induced a unique ISG expression profile marked by the
induction of interferon regulatory factor (IRF)-1 and IRF-7, and resulted in
further enhancement of antiviral action against the IFN-alfa-2a–resistant
HCV replicon.
Based on these findings,
the authors conclude, “The application of IFN alfacon-1 alone or in
combination with IFN gamma 1b induces a cellular antiviral response distinct
from that induced by IFN-alfa-2a or PEG IFN-alfa-2b. This distinction may
provide an advantage for the treatment of chronic HCV in infected
individuals who do not respond to pegylated interferon alpha-2-containing
regimens.”
05/27/05
Reference
A Kaup, C Wang and M. Gale, Jr. Consensus Interferon (IFN
Alfacon-1) Alone or in Combination with IFN Gamma-1b Suppresses Replication
of a PEG IFN-Alpha-2b-resistant Hepatitis C Virus Replicon. Abstract S918.
Digestive Disease Week 2005. May 14-19, 2005. Chicago, IL.
http://www.hivandhepatitis.com/2005icr/ddw2005/docs/hcv_052705_e.html
High Dose Consensus Interferon (Infergen) and Ribavirin Is
Effective for Patients with Chronic Hepatitis B Who Have Failed on
Peginterferon and Ribavirin
The
majority of
nonresponder
and
relapser
patients with chronic hepatitis C are unable to achieve a sustained
virologic response (SVR) with the combination of PEG-Interferon (PEG-IFN)
and ribavirin (RBV), especially those who have
genotype 1
and advanced disease.
Consensus interferon (Interferon alfacon-1, CIFN)
[Infergen] is a bio-optimized alfa interferon that
exhibits increased in-vitro antiviral activity compared to the naturally
occurring alfa interferons 2a and 2b.
Improved response rates have been reported with high-dose CIFN therapy and
RBV for patients who have failed to respond to PEG-IFN / RBV. The aim of the
current study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of high-dose daily
CIFN and RBV in HCV patients who failed therapy with PEG-IFN / RBV.
Patients who had been
treated with PEG-IFN/ RBV for HCV but did not obtain a SVR were eligible for
treatment if they: 1) tolerated treatment with PEG-IFN/RBV, and 2) had
advanced liver disease (bridging
fibrosis or
cirrhosis).
Patients were given 27 ug
of CIFN daily and RBV 400 mg BID during the first four weeks, followed by 18
ug daily and ribavirin 400 mg BID daily for the next eight weeks.
At 12 weeks, CIFN was
decreased to 15 ug daily while RBV was increased to 1,000-1,200 mg daily for
36 weeks.
Results
·
Twenty nine
patients have been enrolled in the study, 76% male with a mean age of 52
years old.
·
94% had
genotype 1 and 39% of patients had cirrhosis.19 patients (62%) have achieved
an early virologic response (EVR) at 12 weeks.
·
Eleven
patients (52%) were undetectable at 24 weeks and 6 patients (43%) achieved
an
End-of-Treatment response.
·
6 patients
were dose reduced and 3 patients stopped therapy due to adverse effects.
|
HCV RNA VIRAL
LOAD |
Week 12
(n=29) |
Week 24
(n=21) |
Week 48
(n=14) |
|
> 2 LOG
DECREASE |
66 % |
----- |
-------- |
|
UNDETECTABLE |
34%
|
52% |
43% |
The authors conclude, “For HCV patients with advanced histologic disease who
had previously failed therapy with PEG-IFN and RBV, the combination of
high-dose CIFN and RBV is a
well-tolerated and effective option.”
05/23/05
Reference
K D Rothstein
and others. High Dose Consensus Interferon and Ribavirin Is Effective for
Treatment of Chronic Hepatitis C Infection in Patients Who Are Resistant to
Peg-Interferon and Ribavirin. Abstract S1536. Digestive Disease Week 2005.
May 14-18, 2005. Paris, France.
http://www.hivandhepatitis.com/2005icr/ddw2005/docs/hcv_052305_d.html
Efficacy of Daily Consensus Interferon (Infergen) and
Ribavirin Compared to Peg-Interferon Alfa2b (PegIntron) and Ribavirin in
Treatment-Naive Patients with HCV Genotype 2 or 3
Consensus interferon (CIFN; Infergen)
is a synthetic type
1 interferon with enhanced in vitro activity compared to conventional
IFN-alfa (IFNa). In the prospective, randomized multicenter PegIntron-Against-Consensus-Trial
(PACT), the efficacy and safety of daily CIFN-treatment and ribavirin is
compared to
peg-IFNa2b [PegIntron] plus ribavirin.
400 patients with chronic
HCV infection and serotype-2 or -3 will randomly be assigned to treatment
with 9 mcg qd CIFN sc. (group A) or peg-IFNa2b (1,5 mcg/kg body weight once
weekly, group B), each in combination with ribavirin (>10,6 mg/kg body
weight) for 24 weeks.
Treatment is interrupted
for primary non-response, if viral load drops by less than 2 log until week
12 or drops by more than 2 log but remains positive at week 16.
Follow up includes further
24 weeks. Viral response rates are analyzed by the Roche COBAS Amplicor HCV
Monitor v2.0 test.
129 patients out of 199
patients enrolled before November 2004 reached at least the end of treatment
at week 24 and represent the base of this interim analysis.
Results
¡¤
There were
no significant differences in patient baseline characteristics between both
treatment groups concerning age, gender, genotype and viral load.
¡¤
The
virological response rates analyzed as intent-to-treat are shown in the
Table:
| |
Group A
|
Group B
|
| |
wk 12
(n=67) |
wk 24
(n=68) |
wk 48
(n=43) |
wk 12
(n=60) |
wk 24
(n=61) |
wk 48
(n=38) |
|
PCR neg |
99% |
93% |
95% |
92% |
94% |
95% |
¡¤
Thus, end-of
treatment response (ETR) rates as well as sustained virological response (SVR)
rates were very high and identical in both treatment groups.
¡¤
This was
also true for all subgroup analyses, including analysis according to
baseline viral load (< vs. ¡Ý 800.000 IU/ml) gender, body weight (< vs. ¡Ý
75 kg) and age (< vs. ¡Ý 60 yrs).
¡¤
Treatment
was rather well tolerated in both treatment groups, as there were no
significant differences in the numbers of serious adverse events or preterm
treatment discontinuations.
Conclusions
In conclusion, the authors
write, ¡°In treatment-naive patients with chronic hepatitis C and serotype-2
or -3 infection, daily treatment with CIFN combined with ribavirin has the
same antiviral efficacy and safety profile as weight adjusted peg-IFNa2b.
Further analyses will show whether some subgroups might preferentially
benefit from one or the other interferon.¡±
05/18/05
Reference
W Bocher
and others. Interim Results From the PACT-Trial: High Antiviral Efficacy Of
Daily Consensus Interferon/ribavirin Compared To Peg-Interferon Alfa2b/ribavirin
in Treatment-Naive Patients With Chronic Hepatitis C and Serotype-2 or -3.
SABstract S1531. Digestive Disease Week 2005. May 14-18, 2005.
Chicago, IL.
http://www.hivandhepatitis.com/2005icr/ddw2005/docs/hcv_051805e.html
Consensus Interferon for Peg/RBV
Nonresponders
|
55th Annual
Meeting of the American association for the Study of Liver Diseases
October 29-November 2, 2004
Boston, MA |
| |
Reported by Jules Levin
Carroll Leevy reported results from a pilot study of high dose Consensus
Interferon (IFN alfacon-1) for patients who did not respond to pegIFN
plus RBV. In vitro Consensus Interferon appears more potent than IFN a
or b. In this study patients started therapy with peg-IFN-a-2 +RBV.
Patients who did not achieve >2 log HCV RNA reductions by 12 weeks (nonresponders)
received IFN alfacon-1 15 mcg once daily plus weight based RBV for 12
weeks and then received IFNalfacon-1 15 mcg three times per week for 36
weeks (n=137). This was followed by a 24 week followup period. There
were 45 African-Americans (27 men, 18 women) and 92 non
African-Americans (49 men, 41 females) receiving treatment. Over 90%
were genotype 1. Baseline viral load was 6.2 log copies/ml.
Doctors in the audience again came to the microphone to say they have
tried high dose Consensus IFN but their patients could not tolerate it.
Leevy countered by saying that 15% of patients dose reduced or took drug
holidays. Growth factor was permitted. Additionally, patients were
selected for this study. Only patients who were >80% adherent on PegIFN/RBV
were permitted into the study. Also, patients did not wash out but were
switched immediately to new interferon therapy, which may have
facilitated tolerance. It appears that this therapy is for motivated
patients. But Leevy said all patients completed therapy in this study.
Large phase III studies are ongoing.
RESULTS
OVERALL RESPONSES TO THERAPY
WEEK 12 on IFNalfacon-1: 23% HCV RNA negative; 60% >2 log HCV RNA
reduction
WEEK 24 on IFN-alfacon-1: 31% HCV RNA negative; 69% >2 log reduction
WEEK 48 on IFN-alfacon-1: 43% HCV RNA negative
WEEK 72: 37% SVR
N=137 at all time points.
HCV RNA NEGATIVE RESPONSES BY ETHNIC GROUP
WEEK 12: 13% AAs; 28% non-AAs
WEEK 24: 24% AAs; 35% non-AAs
WEEK 48: 31% AAs; 48$ non-AAs
WEEK 72: 27% SVR AAs; 41% non-AAs SVR (p=0.09)
N=137 at all time points.
Throughout time on therapy platelet count remained relatively stable.
WBC counts had significant decreases. 22 patients (16%) had a reduction
in WBC (ANC <0.75 x 109) that required GCSF. Hematocrit declined
throughout treatment period.
Leevy concluded:
Patients who did not achieve an EVR after treatment with peg-IFN + RBV
can achieve an SVR after switching to IFN alfacon-1 (15 mcg) +RBV (37%)
overall for 48 weeks, Virologic reduction in HCV RNA after 12 weeks of
peg-IFN-a-2 + RBV is predictive of SVR to IFN alfacon-1 (15 mcg) + RBV.
African-Americans achieved an SVR of 27%, non-African-Americans achieved
an SVR of 41%. Leevy said therapy was well tolerated. Further study is
ongoing in phase III studies by Intermune.
http://www.natap.org/ |
|