Fibrosis

2005 Research

Back to Index of Research Articles

(Back to Main Fibrosis Page)

  Fibrosis Evaluation: Comparison of FibroScan with Liver Biopsy, Fibrotest, Fornscore, Apri, Hyaluronan, Prothrombin Time, and AST/ALT Ratio 

Screening for Fibrosis with Non-invasive Biomarkers (Fibrotest) in Hyperlipidemic Patients

Are Current Fibrosis Serum Markers an Adequate Alternative to Liver Biopsy?

MONITORING LIVER ELASTICITY:  A NEW TOOL TO MEASURE LIVER FIBROSIS DURING THERAPY

Interferon's Benefits for Fibrosis Studied

Relationship Between Serum Ferritin, Hepatic Iron Staining, Diabetes Mellitus and Fibrosis Progression in Patients with Chronic Hepatitis

Predicting Progressive Fibrosis Stage by Baseline and Subsequent Liver Biopsy

Impact of Steatosis on the Progression of Fibrosis in Patients with Mild Hepatitis

  Women May be Protected Against Fibrosis, Suggests Study

 

  Fibrosis Evaluation: Comparison of FibroScan with Liver Biopsy, Fibrotest, Fornscore, Apri, Hyaluronan, Prothrombin Time, and AST/ALT Ratio 

Transient elastography (FibroScan®, Echosens, France) is a new non-invasive rapid and reproducible method allowing evaluation of liver fibrosis by measurement of liver stiffness. The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate, in patients with chronic liver disease, the accuracy of FibroScan®, Fibrotest®, Forns score, APRI, hyaluronan, AST/ALT ratio, and prothrombin time (PT) compared to liver biopsy, for the diagnosis of fibrosis.

363 consecutive patients (216 males, mean age 51 years) with chronic liver disease (HCV (n=190) or HBV infection (n=13), alcoholic liver disease (n=43), others (n=117) were included.

Results

Fibrosis score according to Metavir split as follow: F0-F1 n=114, F2 n=101, F3 n=52, F4 n=96.

Liver stiffness ranged from 2.7 to 75 kPa. For a positive predictive value > 90%, cut-off values of FibroScan® were 8.6 kPa for F≥2, 13 kPa for F≥3 and 17.6 kPa for F=4.

The AUROCs (95% CI) are shown in the table. The best performances were obtained by combining Fibroscan® with Fibrotest® or Forns with AUROCs of 0.80 and 0.81 for F≥2, 0.89 and 0.84 for F≥3, 0.94 and 0.95 for F=F4, respectively.

When FibroScan® and Fibrotest® agreed, the concordance with liver biopsy was 76% for F≥2, 93% for F≥3, and 98% for F=4.

The authors conclude, “In chronic liver diseases, FibroScan® is an efficient, non-invasive method for the diagnosis of fibrosis. Its performance is of the same order as that of serological markers of fibrosis.”

“Combining FibroScan® and Fibrotest® or Fornscore in the assessment of fibrosis could avoid liver biopsy in the majority of patients with chronic liver disease.”



05/02/05

Reference
J Foucher and others. FIBROSIS EVALUATION IN CHRONIC LIVER DISEASES: COMPARISON OF FIBROSCAN® WITH LIVER BIOPSY, FIBROTEST®, FORNS SCORE, APRI, HYALURONAN, PROTHROMBIN TIME, AND AST/ALT RATIO. Abstract 200. 40th EASL. April 13-17, 2005. Paris, France.

http://hivandhepatitis.com/2005icr/easl/docs/050205_hcv_c.html

 

Screening for Fibrosis with Non-invasive Biomarkers (Fibrotest) in Hyperlipidemic Patients 

Insulin resistance is a cause of liver disease that can lead to cirrhosis. Hyperlipidemic patients (HP) have multiple insulin resistance factors and frequent abnormal liver function tests. HP should be screened for significant liver fibrosis (bridging fibrosis: early F2, advanced F3, cirrhosis F4) but biopsy is inappropriate because of the high number of patients at risk. 

The aim of the cureent study was to use FibroTest, validated in chronic hepatitis C1, B2, alcoholic3 and non-alcoholic steatosis4, to identify HP with F2F3F4.

A consecutive cohort of HP, HCV-HBVneg, <50g alcohol/day, followed in a lipid center was analyzed. Fibrotest was retrospectively performed on frozen fasting sera (–80 C); a control group of blood donors was prospectively included. Fibrotest was performed blinded with security algorithms to identify high-risk of false negative/positive.

Results

Among 1,542 subjects, 40 (2.59%) were excluded using security algorithms, and 1,502 included: 50.3% female, median age 49yrs, 957 HP and 545 controls.

Among HP, 83.4% had cholesterol >=200mg/dl, 93.6% LDL-C >=100mg/dl, 17.5% triglycerides >=200mg/dl, 35.9% BMI >=27, 33% arterial hypertension, 31.8% insulinemia >=10mUI/ml and 13.7% glucose >=6mmol/L.

GGT or ALT were elevated (>=50 IU/L) in 215 HP (22.5%).

F2F3F4 were identified by Fibrotest in 25/957 (2.6%) HP, including 13 F2, 8 F3 and 4 F4 but in none (0%) of the 545 controls (P<0.0001).

Among 25 HP with fibrosis, 19 had normal ALT, 14 normal GGT, 12 normal ALT and GGT, 4 elevated ALT and GGT and 9 elevated ALT or GGT.

Factors associated (p<0.01) with fibrosis were higher age, BMI, triglycerides, uricemia, and insulinemia. In multivariate logistic regression, including alcohol consumption, insulinemia (P=0.003) and triglycerides (P=0.008) were the most significant risk factors.

In HP with triglycerides >=200 mg/dl prevalence of fibrosis was 8.3% and 6.6% with insulinemia >=10mUI/ml. 

Conclusions

Based on these results, the authors conclude, “Screening strategies for liver fibrosis are feasible with biomarkers in high-risk groups such as HP.”

“Without such non-invasive strategies a liver biopsy would have been indicated in up to 22.5% of HP with elevated GGT or ALT and would have probably missed half of HP with fibrosis, who had normal GGT and ALT.”

Biopredictive Department, Metabolism Unit, Biochemistry Department, Transfusion Unit, and  Hepato-Gastroenterology Department,GHPS, Paris, France.

05/02/05

Reference
M Munteanu and others. SCREENING FOR SIGNIFICANT FIBROSIS USING NON-INVASIVE BIOMARKERS (FIBROTEST) IN HYPERLIPIDEMIC PATIENTS (HP). Abstract 689. 40th EASL. April 13-17, 2005. Paris, France.
 

http://hivandhepatitis.com/2005icr/easl/docs/050205_hcv_d.html

 

 

Are Current Fibrosis Serum Markers an Adequate Alternative to Liver Biopsy? 
 

French researchers recently described a score of fibrosis combining PIIINP and MMP-1, which are involved in fibrogenesis and fibrolysis, respectively. The aim of this study was to evaluate its diagnostic accuracy compared to that of a panel of other markers including prothrombin time (PT), hyaluronate (HA), Fibrotest (FT), APRI and Forns’ score in chronic hepatitis C (CHC) patients

One hundred and eighty CHC patients seen in our centre for a pre-therapeutic liver biopsy were prospectively included. Liver fibrosis was assessed using the METAVIR index. Sinusoidal fibrosis, steatosis and iron load were quantified. Biochemical measurements were performed on serums collected the day of the biopsy.

Results

Median length of liver biopsies was 22 mm. Patients were classified as F0:n=15, F1:n=74, F2:n=40, F3:n=26, F4:n=24.

Overall diagnostic accuracy of the 4 combined scores was better than that observed with PT and HA alone.

AUROC ranged from 0.79 to 0.84 for discriminating F0/F1 vs F2/F3/F4 and from 0.81 to 0.88 for discriminating F0/F1/F2 vs F3/F4 (NS).

Accuracy was not altered by the length of biopsies or by the presence of sinusoidal fibrosis, steatosis or iron in liver.

Applying the lower cut-off described for each score, METAVIR fibrosis greater than F1 could be ruled out in about one third of patients with NPV ranging from 82 to 84%.

The higher cut-off selected about 20% of patients whom extensive fibrosis (F3F4) was confirmed with a PPV ranging from 89 to 93%.

Simultaneous use of at least 2 scores improved NPV up to 100% for the diagnosis of F0F1, but decreased the number of selected patients.

Commercial application of FT proposes an estimated fibrosis METAVIR.

Discordances of at least 1 point were observed in 52% and of 2 points in 22% of patients. The only parameter associated with discordance was FT between 0.20 and 0.80.

Conclusion

The authors conclude, “Our results confirm that PIIINP/MMP-1 provides relevant information on liver fibrosis with a good accuracy, comparable to that observed with FT, APRI and Forns’ score.”

“However, none of these scores can reliably give an estimated METAVIR index in each patient. Combination of several scores could improve their accuracy. “

Département D'hépato-Gastroentérologie, Département D'anatomie-Pathologie et Histologie, Laboratoire D'enzymologie, and Laboratoire de Biochimie, DBI, Grenoble, France.

05/02/05

Reference
V  Leroy and others. ARE CURRENT FIBROSIS SERUM MARKERS REALLY AN ALTERNATIVE TO LIVER BIOPSY IN CHRONIC HEPATITIS C? Abstract 577. 40th EASL. April 13-17, 2005. Paris, France.

http://hivandhepatitis.com/2005icr/easl/docs/050205_hcv_e.html

 

 

MONITORING LIVER ELASTICITY:  A NEW TOOL TO MEASURE LIVER FIBROSIS DURING THERAPY

B. Coco, F. Oliveri, P. Colombatto, P. Ciccorossi, R. Sacco, F. Bonino, M.R. Brunetto  

 

Introduction

Hepatic fibrosis is the major indicator of progressive liver disease. However histology, the gold standard for fibrosis, requires an invasive procedure, that is unsuitable for monitoring disease progression and may be affected by sampling errors.

 

Aim

Our aim was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy (DA) of liver elasticity by Fibroscan (a device equipped with a vibrator and an ultrasound system; Echosens, Paris, France) for detection of hepatic fibrosis and cirrhosis in a cohort of patients with viral (HBV and HCV) chronic hepatitis.

 

Patients

We measured liver elasticity in 178 consecutive patients: 105 had liver biopsy showing chronic hepatitis with or without cirrhosis and 56 had compensated (Child A) cirrhosis. Histological grading and staging were scored according to Ishak classification. Liver elasticity measurement were reproducible and operator-indipendent. Seventeen patients  were excluded from the analysis (liver biopsy not suitable for staging in 8 and technical limitation to Fibroscan in 9). 

 

Results

Stiffness values at the Fibroscan significantly correlated with fibrosis scores (Table n1). Liver elasticity  value higher than 14 KPa (cut-off defined by ROC analysis) identified patients with cirrhosis with 72,6% sensitivity and 93,5% specificity (DA 82,6%). Among cirrhotic patients those with IFN/antiviral induced biochemical remission (23 of 60) had significantly lower elasticity mean values (13,2 vs 24,3 KPa, p<0,001). In the group of patients with persistent disease activity Fibroscan showed a better AD (88,2%), with 83,9% sensitivity, 92,9% specificity. 

 

Conclusion

Liver elasticity measured  by Fibroscan correlates with fibrosis at histology significantly and lower stiffness values in patients with biochemical remission prompt its clinical usefulness to monitor treatment efficacy.

http://www.hcvadvocate.org/news/reports/EASL_2005/April%2015a.htm#a15a_1

 

   
 
 
Interferon's Benefits for Fibrosis Studied

People with liver fibrosis can see an improvement in their disease after taking interferon-alfa, says a new study from Greece, but those who achieve a sustained virological response (SVR) have the best outcomes.1

Still, even non-responders and those who relapse can see a benefit from the medication, depending on the length of time that they take it, according to doctors in the Academic Department of Medicine at Hippokration Hospital of Athens, Greece.

Clarifying the Mystery
The researchers wanted to learn more about the specific effect that this standard hepatitis therapy has on their patients with fibrosis of the liver. Currently, the only measure of interferon treatment failure or success is a patient's ability to achieve an SVR, or sustained virological response, defined as maintaining undetectable levels of the virus for at least 6 months after therapy is discontinued.

Fibrosis is scarring of the liver that occurs in hepatitis infection. It can potentially progress to cirrhosis, a type of chronic liver disease in which normal cells are damaged and replaced by scar tissue. Cirrhosis ranks as the eighth leading cause of death in the United States.2

"The possible effect of interferon-alfa on liver fibrosis progression has not been adequately studied in chronic hepatitis B,” wrote George Papatheodoridis, MD, and his colleagues.

Comparing Treated with Untreated Patients
In an attempt to come up with more answers, Papatheodoridis' group retrospectively evaluated 147 patients with chronic hepatitis B who were also E antigen-negative. That's a mutant form of hepatitis B that tends to be more resistant to treatment. "In fact, there were suggestions that only nucleoside analogues have a beneficial effect on liver histology" in these patients, explained Papatheordoridis, an associate professor in Medicine and Gastroenterology who led the study, in an interview with Priority Healthcare. Nucleoside analogs like Hepsera (adefovir dipivoxil) and Epivir-HBV (lamivudine) interfere with the activity of an enzyme that the hepatitis B virus uses to make copies of itself.3

One hundred twenty patients had previously been treated with interferon alfa, and the remaining 27 had not. Each patient had undergone at least 2 biopsies previously, as well.

Papatheodoridis and his colleagues found fibrosis improved in about 17 percent of the treated patients, overall, compared to just 4 percent of those who didn't receive therapy. Those who achieved sustained virological responses  had the most improvement in liver fibrosis compared to relapsers, who had the worst improvement.

Even Relapsers and Nonresponders Benefited
They also learned that interferon induced a sustained response in 30 patients, but 57 only had an initial response, and then subsequently relapsed. The remaining 33 had no response.

Fibrosis also worsened in about a third of those treated—the worst progression mostly in nonresponders. But that compares to some 70 percent of those who didn't undergo interferon therapy at all, the researchers found.

"The annual rate of fibrosis progression was worse in the untreated than in treated patients," Papatheodoridis and his colleagues wrote, a significant finding, even considering nonresponders and relapsers.

The research team also discovered that several key factors increased the likelihood of fibrosis progression: older age, and worse liver disease or lower fibrosis level at the beginning of this study.

Interferon Benefits Found in All Cases
After collecting their data, the researchers summarized that "interferon alfa significantly reduces the rate of fibrosis progression, but such an effect is mainly observed in patients with sustained biochemical responses." In those who relapse after initial treatment with interferon and in non-responders, the beneficial effect on fibrosis depends on how long treatment is given, they said.

"Sustained off-therapy response should remain the measure of interferon efficacy," Papatheodoridis told Priority Healthcare. "However, we showed that, although sustained off-therapy response is the optimal outcome and results in significant improvement of fibrosis, the worsening of liver fibrosis is slower in patients without such a response (relapsers or non-responders) compared with untreated cases."

Though the benefit for non-responders and relapsers may be temporary, other antiviral agents could be subsequently prescribed, Papatheodoridis explained.

'First Therapeutic Option'
Intron-A is the form of interferon alfa used to treat people with hepatitis B. But it's not necessarily intended for every HBV patient. Those who are chronically infected, have higher liver enzyme levels and actively replicating virus are typical candidates for this therapy. Clinical studies have shown that approximately 45 percent of patients prescribed Intron-A respond to the therapy.4

"We will continue further studies in more detailed aspects of this area," Papatheodoridis said. "I think that our study further strengthens the suggestions that interferon should be the first therapeutic option for patients with HBV E antigen-negative chronic hepatitis B."

1. Papatheodoridis GV, Petraki K, Cholongitas E, Kanta E, Ketikoglou I, Manesis EK. J Viral Hepat 2005 Mar;12(2):199-206.
2. American Liver Foundation. What Are the Diseases that Affect the Liver? Available at: http://www.liverfoundation.org/cgi-bin/dbs/articles.cgi db=articles&uid=default&ID=1043&view_records=1.
Accessed March 11, 2005.
3. Zoulim F, Trepo C. New antiviral agents for the therapy of chronic hepatitis B virus infection. Intervirology 1999;42(2-3):125-44.
4. Hepatitis Neighborhood. HBV Medications: Intron-A, Epivir HBV & Hepsera. Available at: http://www.hepatitisneighborhood.com/content/

treatment_options/medications_for_hepatitis_287.aspx.
Accessed March 11, 2005.

John Martin is a long-time health journalist and an editor for Priority Healthcare. His credits include coverage of health news for the website of Fox Television's The Health Network, and articles for the New York Post and other consumer and trade publications.

http://www.hepatitisneighborhood.com/content/in_the_news/archive_2283.aspx

 

Relationship Between Serum Ferritin, Hepatic Iron Staining, Diabetes Mellitus and Fibrosis Progression in Patients with Chronic Hepatitis C  
 

Chronic infection with the hepatitis C virus affects over 170 million individuals worldwide and 20% of patients develop cirrhosis after 20 years. Increased iron stores and hepatic iron content have been suggested as important contributors to fibrosis progression. As well, the increased prevalence of diabetes mellitus has been associated with increased iron deposits in patients with chronic hepatitis C.

The aim of the current study was to assess the potential relationship between serum ferritin and hepatic iron staining and liver fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus infection and whether these factors are increased in diabetic patients with hepatitis C virus.

This was a cross-sectional, multi-centre study involving hospitals in the north-east of London between 1992 and 2003. Chronic hepatitis C patients with a liver biopsy and data concerning age, sex, basal metabolic index, diabetes mellitus or impaired glucose tolerance, alcohol intake, serum ferritin level and ethnicity were enrolled. Each biopsy was scored for fibrosis and stained for hepatic iron.

Three hundred and thirty nine patients (200 Caucasian; 139 Asian) were enrolled. Fifty three patients had no fibrosis, 131 had mild fibrosis (stage one to two Modified Ishak), 68 moderate fibrosis (stage three to four) and 87 cirrhosis (stage five to six).

Findings

4.4% of patients had elevations in serum ferritin, while 11% had increased hepatic iron staining;

The serum ferritin and hepatic iron staining were unrelated to the degree of fibrosis;

Serum ferritin was significantly higher in patients with diabetes or impaired glucose tolerance compared to non-diabetics;

No association was seen between diabetes and hepatic iron staining.

Conclusions

The authors conclude, “Many patients with chronic hepatitis C virus infection may have elevated serum ferritin and/or iron deposition within the liver. However, neither played a significant role in the progression of hepatitis C virus-related liver injury.”

“The association between chronic hepatitis C virus infection and type II diabetes mellitus exists, however the biological mechanism of this association still remains to be elucidated.”

Hepatobiliary Group, Institute of Cellular and Molecular Science, Queen Mary's School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, UK.

03/09/05

Reference
R F C D'Souza and others. Relationship between serum ferritin, hepatic iron staining, diabetes mellitus and fibrosis progression in patients with chronic hepatitis C. Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics 21(5): 519-24. March 1, 2005.

 

Predicting Progressive Fibrosis Stage by Baseline and Subsequent Liver Biopsy  
 

Results of retrospective suggest that 20% of individuals with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection become cirrhotic within 20 years. Known risk factors for advanced hepatic fibrosis include age at time of infection, male sex, excess alcohol consumption, and cytokine polymorphisms.

This prospective study aimed to evaluate and identify factors predictive of change in hepatic fibrosis stage in chronic HCV infection by interval protocol liver biopsy.

One hundred and five patients with paired liver biopsy specimens separated by a mean 41 months were recruited from a cohort of 823 HCV carriers.

Results

Five per cent of participants developed worsening hepatic fibrosis by more than two stages. In 43% there was no change in fibrosis stage. Excessive alcohol intake currently or previously predicted progression.

In contrast, always having a normal alanine transaminase and always being negative in serum for HCV RNA predicted no progression.

Three models were developed to predict outcome. Progressive fibrosis was predicted by baseline fibrosis, steatosis and age.

The rate of progressive fibrosis was predicted by baseline fibrosis, steatosis and lobular inflammation. Fibrosis stage on the second biopsy was predicted by baseline fibrosis alone. The rate of progression varies widely. Alcohol misuse is an important co-factor.

Progressive fibrosis can be predicted at first liver biopsy, where baseline fibrosis is most critical, allowing targeted therapy for those with early disease and a significant risk of progression.

02/18/05

Reference
J D Collier and others. Predicting Progressive Hepatic Fibrosis Stage on Subsequent Liver Biopsy in Chronic Hepatitis C Virus Infection. Journal of Viral Hepatitis 12 (1): 74-80. 2005.

http://www.hivandhepatitis.com/hep_c/news/2005/021805_a.html

Impact of Steatosis on the Progression of Fibrosis in Patients with Mild Hepatitis  
 

In patients with mild hepatitis C, the usefulness of antiviral therapy is a subject of debate, as a low risk for progression of fibrosis is assumed. Several studies have shown that steatosis (fatty liver) is a strong and independent predictor of the severity as well as the progression of fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C.

The present study assessed the impact of steatosis on the progression of fibrosis between paired liver biopsies in untreated patients with mild hepatitis on index biopsy.

One hundred thirty-five untreated patients (mean age, 38 years; M/F sex ratio, 1.43) with one known risk factor of infection (68 transfusions, 67 injecting drug use) had 2 liver biopsies after a median interval of 61 months (18-158). All had METAVIR score of A1F1 or lower at first liver biopsy.

Unequivocal progression of fibrosis was considered if patients had a fibrosis score of 3 or 4 at the second liver biopsy. The probability of progression of fibrosis was estimated by using the Kaplan-Meier method.

During follow-up, progression of fibrosis occurred in 21 patients (16%) after a median delay of 65 months. Cumulative probabilities of the progression of fibrosis at 4 and 6 years were 5.2% and 19.8%, respectively.

In multivariate analysis, steatosis was the only independent factor predictive of progression of fibrosis. Probability of progression of fibrosis was significantly related to the percentage of hepatocytes with steatosis.

The authors conclude, “Steatosis is a major determinant of the progression of fibrosis in mild hepatitis C, regardless of the genotype. Our results argue for antiviral treatment in the subgroup of patients with mild hepatitis and steatosis.”

01/05/05

Reference
L Fartoux and others. Impact of steatosis on progression of fibrosis in patients with mild hepatitis. Hepatology 41(1): 82-87. January 2005.

http://www.hivandhepatitis.com/hep_c/news/2005/010505_b.html

 

 
Women May be Protected Against Fibrosis, Suggests Study

If you're female, you may be protected against the risk of fibrosis progression in hepatitis C better than men. So say medical researchers in France who analyzed the gender differences in fibrosis development in over 200 women.1

Estrogen May be Prophylactic
Vincent Di Martino, MD, and his associates with Service d'Hepato-Gastroenterologie at Pitie-Salpetriere Hospital in Paris wanted to "evaluate the influence of past pregnancies, oral contraceptives, menopause, and hormone replacement therapy (HRT) on liver fibrosis progression in HCV-infected women."

Doctors have hypothesized in previous scientific studies that estrogens may exert an antifibrotic effect in some way.

"Recent data strongly suggest that estrogens and/or estrogen receptors have an impact on the course of liver disease," wrote Di Martino and the study investigators. But the effect that estrogens play on liver fibrosis risk hasn't been studied extensively, they added.

Survey Questions Distributed
For the analysis, Di Martino and his colleagues circulated a survey among the respondents, asking them about their pregnancy history, whether or not they had reached menopause, and their use of oral contraceptives and HRT.

When patient characteristics were analyzed, the investigators learned that the average age of the women when they underwent liver biopsy was 48, 60 percent had a history of blood transfusion, and nearly a fifth of the women had been prior IV drug users. Almost two-thirds of the survey respondents were infected with genotype 1 hepatitis C, the most common and the most difficult to treat of all the hepatitis genotypes.2

In evaluating the women's exposures to estrogen, they reported their age at first menstrual period, on average, was 13 and there was an average of nearly 30 years of fertility before they underwent liver biopsy indicating hepatitis infection. In addition, nearly two-thirds had had at least one pregnancy prior to their hepatitis diagnosis. Another 61 percent reported they were menopausal when their hepatitis infection was confirmed. The investigators found that 67 percent of the women were taking oral contraceptives before liver biopsy, one-fifth of whom were on the pill at the time of biopsy.

When the researchers looked at HRT use, more than half of the women in the survey said they had been prescribed the therapy previously, and a large majority in that group had been taking HRT at the time their hepatitis infection was confirmed.

Estrogen Exposure and Fibrosis Risk
The investigators then measured fibrosis stage and development in each of the women. They found that the rate of fibrosis development was "significantly higher" in women who had never been pregnant compared to those who had given birth at least once previously. They also found that postmenopausal women tended to have more advanced fibrosis compared to premenopausal females. That, after taking into account other factors that could have caused more advanced fibrosis like age and level of liver inflammation. Women who had no history of HRT also tended to have more advanced fibrosis and faster fibrosis development compared to those who had been previously prescribed the therapy, Di Martino and his colleagues found. "In fact, the mean estimated rate of fibrosis progression of the postmenopausal women who had received HRT was similar to that of premenopausal women," the investigators noted.

Fibrosis was less advanced, on average, in women who had previously used oral contraceptives, as well. However, oral contraceptive use had no impact on the rate of fibrosis development, they reported. This could be due, they theorized, to insufficient levels of estradiol in the medication, which wouldn't have increased estrogen levels to a point at which they might have provided the protection.

"Our study of the events of reproductive life and estrogen therapy provides consistent evidence that estrogens may have a protective effect on the long-term course of chronic hepatitis C in females," write Di Martino and his colleagues.

Researchers: Our Results Are 'Intriguing'
Still, the researchers admit their study had several limitations, such as the possibility that women may not have recalled certain information accurately, which would have a direct effect on the results.

The findings are "intriguing" they wrote, but quickly adding that the results "should be considered hypothesis-generating and in need of confirmation." Of particular interest is the link between fibrosis development and HRT use in postmenopausal women, they wrote. "The menopausal state was independently associated with accelerated fibrosis progression," a finding that has valuable implications for physicians treating women with HCV who've reached menopause. Doctors are often reluctant to prescribe HRT for these women, they pointed out, because of the drugs' potential toxicity to the liver in those cases. "Our findings suggest that this treatment—or at least the combination of transdermal estrogen and oral progesterone—is safe and potentially beneficial with respect to liver fibrosis."

The Estrogen/Liver Cancer Link
While there hasn't been much research on whether or not women possess a hormonal protection against fibrosis development, doctors in Taiwan in late 2003 found that women were similarly protected against the development of hepatocellular carcinoma, possibly for similar reasons.3

In their study of nearly 1,000 women, doctors at National Taiwan University found that women who had a history of more pregnancies faced a significantly lower risk of developing hepatocellular carcinoma compared to those females who had had fewer pregnancies. They also learned that those who were older at menopause tended to have a lower risk of liver cancer compared to those who entered menopause earlier. "Use of hormone replacement therapy was associated with a lower risk of hepatocellular carcinoma, and there was a trend in the risk with increasing duration of HRT," they wrote.

Based on these findings, the Taiwanese physicians suspected that greater exposure to estrogen may be protective against liver cancer.

Similarly, some of the same doctors at Pitie-Salpetriere hospital in Paris published a study earlier that same year that examined the factors that increased or slowed the rate of fibrosis development in nearly 5,000 people with varying types of liver diseases. Among other factors, they found that being female tended to slow the development of fibrosis, though they didn't examine the possible causes. By contrast, the investigators also noted that this was not the case in alcoholic liver disease. Women with that disease tended to develop fibrosis faster, they wrote.

1. Di Martino V, Lebray P, Myers RP et al. Progression of liver fibrosis in women infected with hepatitis C; long-term benefit of estrogen exposure. Hepatology 2004 Dec;40(6):1426-33.
2. Fried MW. Viral factors affecting the outcome of therapy for chronic hepatitis C. Rev Gastroenterol Disord 2004;4(Suppl 1):S8-S13.
3. Yu MW, Chang HC, Chang SC et al. Role of reproductive factors in hepatocellular carcinoma: Impact on hepatitis B-and C-related risk. Hepatology 2003 Dec;38(6):1393-400.


John Martin is a long-time health journalist and an editor for Priority Healthcare. His credits include coverage of health news for the website of Fox Television's The Health Network, and articles for the New York Post and other consumer and trade publications.

 

 

 
HOME Liver Cancer
FAQ Great Place To Start Autoimmune Hepatitis
Have You Just Been Diagnosed ? Other Medical Conditions & HCV
Glossary HCV Worldwide News & Research
History Of HCV HCV News Archives 2001-2002
Your Liver Functions Internet Conference Reports on All New and Current HCV Therapies
Symptoms Of HCV Nutrition & HCV
Transmission Of HCV Interviews: Members & Professionals
Sex And HCV HCV Support Groups Listed By State
Understanding Your Blood Tests  Labs Transplant Support Groups Listed By State
Monitoring Blood Work On Treatment Insurance, Financial Aid & Free Meds
Liver Biopsy Understanding Your Results How to Find a Doctor & What to Ask
Viral Loads Members Share Their First Shot Experience
Genotypes Shared Stories From Our  Members
Infergen Your Questions & HCV
 Inhibitors &  New Therapies Chat Room & Message Boards
Peg Intron & Pegasys Books On HCV
Help With Side Effects During Treatment Food For The Soul Inspirational Stories
Drug Interactions & Treatment Informative Links
Latest HCV Trials Pictures Of Our Members
Liver Fibrosis What's New at Janis and Friends
Cirrhosis Sign Our Guestbook
Transplants Contact Us mailto:JansDream@angelhaven.com
Current Transplant Research In Memory Of Janis

Reviewed May 5  2005