Cirrhosis Research
Treatment of HCV in Cirrhotic Patients
|
Safety and Efficacy Of Antiviral Therapy in Patients With
Decompensated Cirrhosis Associated With Chronic Hepatitis C Infection
Previous studies have
shown that the presence of liver cirrhosis is associated with lower
sustained viral response (SVR) rates after peginterferon-ribavirin therapy. |
|
| Trial of acarbose in hepatic encephalopathy | |
| Coagulation tests unlikely to reflect thrombin generation in cirrhosis | |
| Malnutrition and Liver Cirrhosis: Scoping Out the Signs | |
| Short-Term Celebrex Safe Against Cirrhosis |
Safety and Efficacy Of Antiviral Therapy in Patients With Decompensated Cirrhosis Associated With Chronic Hepatitis C InfectionJ.K. Lim, J.C. Imperial Background/Aims: Decompensated liver disease associated with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is the most common indication for liver transplantation in the U.S. Although interferon-based regimens are frequently used in compensated cirrhosis, the role of antiviral therapy in the treatment of patients with decompensated cirrhosis remains poorly defined. Methods: We evaluated the safety and efficacy of antiviral therapy in 32 patients with decompensated HCV cirrhosis. At the time of inclusion, 25.0% of patients were Child-Pugh A, 59.4% were Child-Pugh B, and 15.6% were Child-Pugh C, with a mean Child-Pugh score of 8.03 +/- 1.75 (95% CI 7.40-8.66). Most patients were white (87.5%) and male (74.2%), with a mean age of 54.9 +/- 7.2 years (95% CI 52.28-57.47) and mean weight of 92.2 +/- 24.4 kg (95% CI 83.41-101.0). Thrombocytopenia (90.6%), fluid retention (62.5%), esophageal varices (46.9%), and hepatic encephalopathy (21.9%) were the most common decompensation events. All patients underwent an intensive pretreatment regimen to optimize hepatic function prior to antiviral therapy (e.g. eradication of varices, resolution of ascites), and were monitored closely throughout therapy within a major university transplant program. Patients were treated with pegylated interferon/ribavirin (78.1%), pegylated interferon monotherapy (12.5%), or interferon/ribavirin (9.4%), for a mean of 37.8 +/- 17.1 weeks (95% CI 31.55-44.13). Results: Sustained virologic response (SVR) was achieved in 10/32 patients (31.3%), including 21.1% in genotype 1 and 53.8% in non-genotype 1 patients. Normalization of ALT was achieved in 40.6% of patients. The mean CTP score following end-of-treatment was 6.06 +/- 1.22 (95% CI 5.62-6.50). Most patients (84.4%) experienced adverse events; six (18.8%) required withdrawal of antiviral therapy, and one (3.1%) experienced liver decompensation. Anemia requiring erythropoietin support (50.0%), neutropenia requiring G-CSF support (15.6%), depression (18.8%), and infections (9.4%) were the most common adverse events. Five patients (15.6%) were removed from transplant listing due to clinical improvement. No patients died during treatment. Conclusion: Antiviral therapy appears to be safe and effective in carefully selected patients with decompensated cirrhosis associated with chronic HCV infection. Treatment may result in SVR in nearly one-third of patients, and lead to improvements in biochemical markers and liver synthetic function. http://www.hcvadvocate.org/news/reports/DDW_2005/May%2015%20HCV.htm#may15_15
Treatment of Cirrhotic HCV Patients with a Low Ascending Daily Dosing Regimen of Consensus Interferon and Ribavirin Antiviral treatment response in patients with chronic hepatitis C and liver cirrhosis is considerably lower than in non-cirrhotic patients and therapy is complicated by high drop-out rates, less tolerablity of side effects and high rates of hematological complications. Pegylated interferons have shown higher response rates than standard interferons, however, also higher dose-reduction and drop-out rates due to lower tolerability, especially regarding thrombocytopenia, thus resulting in an overall only minor benefit. Consensus interferon/CIFN (Infergen) is an interferon with a relatively low half-life, but stronger antiviral potency as shown by high efficacy in nonresponders, according to the authors. The efficacy of CIFN together with ribavirin (RBV) was evaluated in 58 patients with chronic hepatitis C and cirrhosis Child A and B. All patients had histologically proven cirrhosis, elevated ALT values and were viremic, with 73% having genotype 1. Patients were treated with CIFN 9 ug TIW for 6 weeks, followed by 9 ug QD for another 6 weeks. Continuing treatment consisted of CIFN 9 ug QD with RBV with a stepwise increase from 400 mg to 1000 mg QD at 4 week intervals for a total of another 48 weeks. Based on tolerability, the dosing of RBV was increased to a weight-based dosing. Results - At 48 weeks therapy an undetectable HCV-RNA was observed in 57% (n=33) of patients (ITT) with a drop out rate of 21% (n=12). - Data regarding sustained response rates show a 45 % response (n=26). - Due to side effects CIFN had to be dose reduced in 31%, mainly due to low platelet counts. - SVR rates were significantly higher in Child A patients (59%) as compared to Child B patients (28%). - As growth factors erythropoetin as well as G-CSF was used. - Three patients xperienced grade III and one patient a grade IV thrombocytopenia. - Overall tolerability of the CIFN QD regimen was comparable to a standard therapy with pegylated IFN and RBV, while CIFN even as QD treatment resulted in a lower rate of thrombocytopenias. Conclusions Based on these results, the authors conclude, “CIFN as a low ascending and finally daily dosing regimen with subsequent RBV shows significant response rates in Child A and B cirrhotic patients.“ “Therapy is also safe, however, a significant portion of patients was unable to even tolerate low doses of CIFN or RBV. These data suggest that for a subgroup of cirrhotic patients even in stage Child B a combination therapy of CIFN and RBV may lead to viral eradication.” 05/18/05
Reference http://www.hivandhepatitis.com/2005icr/ddw2005/docs/hcv_051805f.html
Association Between Liver Histology, Viral Kinetics and
Outcome of Therapy with Peginterferon Alfa-2a (Pegasys) Combination Therapy
with Ribavirin Previous studies have shown that the presence of liver cirrhosis is associated with lower sustained viral response (SVR) rates after peginterferon-ribavirin therapy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the association between liver histology, viral kinetics, and treatment outcome after peginterferon-ribavirin combination therapy even for milder degrees of liver fibrosis. 272 interferon naïve patients with chronic hepatitis C genotype 1-5 viral infection underwent therapy with peginterferon alfa-2a (Pegasys) in combination with ribavirin in accordance with the DITTO-HCV multi-center trial. 231 of these patients had a liver biopsy that could be evaluated centrally in a blinded fashion by two independent observers using the Ishak protocol. Equivocal issues were debated after the independent scores were noted, and a consensus score was obtained. HCV-RNA levels were determined centrally using the Roche AMPLICOR HCV Test. Results Liver fibrosis was associated with viral kinetics during the first 4 weeks of therapy with null responders having statistically higher fibrosis stages. Likewise having the presence bridging fibrosis and not just cirrhosis was associated with a lower SVR rate in genotype 1 (38% vs. 61%). A similar trend for lower SVR when bridging fibrosis was present was also noted for genotype 2 (83% vs. 100%), genotype 3 (86% vs. 92%), and genotype 4 (0% vs. 50%) though these differences were not statistically significant. No association was seen between fibrosis stage and baseline viral load. However, patients having an inflammation sum score 2 had statistically higher viral loads at baseline. The authors conclude, “Liver histology is associated with baseline viral load prior to, viral kinetics during, and sustained virological response after therapy with peginterferon and ribavirin. Thus assessment of liver histology remains pivotal in decision-making regarding therapeutic intervention especially in the presence of HCV genotype 1 infection.” Department of Clinical Virology, Göteborg University, Göteborg, Sweden, Department of Infectious Diseases, Göteborg University, Göteborg, Sweden, Department of Histopatholgy, Royal Free and University College Medical School, London, UK, Hopital Henri Mondor - Universite Paris XII, Creteil, France, Saarland University Hospital, Homburg/Saar, Germany, University Hospital Rotterdam Dijkzigt, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, Azienda Ospedaliera di Parma, Parma, Italy, Hospital University of Geneve, Geneve, Switzerland, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat Gan, Israel. 04/20/05
Reference http://www.hivandhepatitis.com/2005icr/easl/docs/042205_d.html
Pegylated Interferon Maintenance Therapy Positively
Impacts on Portal Hypertension Secondary to HCV-related Cirrhosis Interferon (IFN) might have antifibrotic effects in addition to its effect against the HCV infection. COPILOT is an ongoing trial evaluating maintenance therapy with pegylated IFN-a-2b (0.5 mg/kg weekly) versus colchicine (0.6 mg twice daily). The study examines different clinical end-points. The 2 years evaluation suggested an improved event free survival in patients on PEG compared to colchicine (P = 0.007). In the present study, the impact of pegylated IFN on portal hypertension (PHTN) was evaluated. Patients enroled in the trial include 270 receiving pegylated IFN and 267 taking colchicine. In each group 83% of subjects with cirrhosis, and 40% of them have PHTN defined by esophageal varices or gastropathy. The survival of these patients with PHTN was superior in the pegylated IFN arm compared to the colchicine arm. IFN-treated subjects had a lower incidence of variceal bleeding. In addition, the development of PHTN at 2 years of follow-up was lower in the group of IFN-treated individuals (12/95, 12%) than in the colchicine group (24/92, 28%) (p= 0.025). In a subgroup of patients who underwent measurements of hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG), a reduction of 41% in their HVPG values was observed after 24 weeks of therapy with pegylated IFN-a-2b. The authors concluded, “Maintenance therapy with pegylated IFN may retard the development of esophageal varices, reduces portal pressure and prevents variceal bleeding and complications of PHTN compared to colchicine,” suggesting that “pegylated IFN should be considered in patients with cirrhosis who fail IFN and ribavirin therapy.” 04/22/05
Reference http://www.hivandhepatitis.com/2005icr/easl/docs/042205_b.html
Treatment of HCV in Cirrhotic Patients Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is considered difficult to treat in patients with cirrhosis. In addition to diminished response to current anti-HCV therapies, these subjects with cirrhosis have a higher risk to develop decompensation of their liver disease and other complications. Two studies presented at the 40th EASL meeting evaluated the efficacy and safety of treatment of patients with HCV-related liver cirrhosis with interferon (IFN)-based therapies [1,2]. The characteristics of the patients and the results of these two works are displayed in table 1 below. Table 1. Interferon-based therapy for the treatment of HCV infection in patients with liver cirrhosis.
*At the investigator’s discretion In the Canadian study, these cirrhotic patients in early stage of disease were compared with non-cirrhotics [1]. There were no differences between both groups of patients in adverse events, nor in the proportion of patients undergoing dose modifications. A trend to have lower responses among cirrhotic subjects compared to non-cirrhotics was observed for all genotypes, being more marked the differences in HCV-1-infected individuals. The authors suggest HCV-infected compensated cirrhotic patients can be successfully treated, and that higher responses may be achieved with optimal doses of RBV (1,000-1,200 mg/day). In the study from the US, with more advanced liver disease, a higher number of subjects required discontinuation of the HCV treatment, and 3% experienced decompensation of liver disease [2]. Anemia requiring erythropoietin (EPO), neutropenia requiring G-CSF, and infections occurred in 50%, 16%, and 9% of subjects, respectively. Of notice, 15.6% of the patients were removed from the transplant list due to clinical improvement. Therefore, treatment of HCV infection in subjects with advanced liver disease may be successful in a subset of well selected patients, especially in those carrying HCV genotypes other than 1. However, more complications arise among these subjects, and although treatment seems to be safe, their follow-up during therapy is very challenging. 04/25/05 References 1. S Lee and others. Peginterferon alfa-2a (40 kD) (PEGASYS®) plus ribavirin (COPEGUS®) in cirrhotic patients with chronic hepatitis C: results of a Canadian multicenter open-label expanded access programme. Abstract 576. 40th EASL. April 13-17, 2005. Paris, France. 2. J K Lim and others. Safety and efficacy of antiviral therapy in patients with decompensated cirrhosis associated with chronic hepatitis C infection. Abstract 579. 40th EASL. April 13-17, 2005. Paris, France. http://www.hivandhepatitis.com/2005icr/easl/docs/042505_hcv1.html
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
People diagnosed with
liver disease commonly experience
malnutrition, according to experts. The reasons for this involve a
multitude of factors.1 One of the main causes is that a damaged
liver as a result of a disease like hepatitis cannot properly
metabolize many of the nutrients that an
individual consumes in his or her
diet. As a result, some patients may need
dietary therapy.2
How is the liver associated with nutrition? Eighty-five percent to 90% of the blood that leaves the stomach and intestines carries significant nutrients to the liver where they are converted into substances the body can use. The liver processes carbohydrates, proteins, fats, and minerals to be used in normal body function.3 Physicians May Miss the Signs "Malnutrition is often underdiagnosed in cirrhosis because the parameters more frequently used to address malnutrition in these patients, such as weight, measurement of skinfolds, and blood tests, are affected by cirrhosis," explained Fatima Figueiredo, MD, PhD, a gastroenterologist at the university and the study's chief investigator, in an interview with Priority Healthcare. "Cirrhosis can increase the weight and the measurements of skinfolds because of the fluid retention and edema that occurs in cirrhosis. Therefore, the disease itself can change these nutritional parameters, delaying the diagnosis of weight loss, for example." Malnutrition in cirrhotic patients increases their likelihood of a poor prognosis and has been associated with increases in general illness and death in patients undergoing liver transplantation, Figueiredo explained. Nailing Down Definitive Signs "The aims of this study were: to quantify body composition changes, to determine tissue loss pattern, and to assess the relation of these to the severity of [liver] dysfunction," wrote the researchers in their study paper. The team first measured levels of total body water and extracellular water in each of the patients. Water makes up about one-half to two-thirds of our total body weight. It is divided into two components: water that is contained within our cells (intracellular water), and the water that floats in the space between our cells (extracellular water). Maintaining water balance is essential to normal body function.4 In determining total body water and extracellular water levels, the researchers measured intracellular water and total body cell mass. The team also measured total body fat in each of the patients. All of these assessments were combined to determine an individual patient's overall nutritional status. At the end of the study, Figueiredo's team learned that extracellular water was increased and intracellular water was lower in people with liver disease. They also found that body cell mass and body fat were lower in these patients, mostly in those with moderate to severe liver disease. The researchers established a pattern of tissue loss; in those with early-stage cirrhosis, the loss of body fat was predominate. In patients with moderate cirrhosis, there were losses in either body cell mass or body fat. But in those with advanced liver cirrhosis, the researchers noted losses in both body fat and body cell mass. "Liver cirrhosis was characterized by a significant reduction in body cell mass and body fat, and by a redistribution of body water," Figueiredo's group concluded. "Significant losses occurred even in patients with mild disease." The investigators say it's hoped their findings will help physicians better diagnose malnutrition and manage the nutritional status of their patients with liver disease. Altering the Diet is Debatable However, Figueiredo says that is a topic of debate among physicians. "It makes sense that if we could properly refeed those patients, we would make a difference in their outcomes," he said. "However, no one has proven this theory yet." Because physicians tend to inadvertently diagnose malnutrition much later in people with cirrhosis, re-designing a proper nutritional diet by then doesn't have much effect because the patients have already developed other related illnesses, which negatively affects their prognoses anyway, Figueiredo explained. "With other [diagnostic] tools for nutritional assessment, we could demonstrate that nutritional depletion occurs very early even when there is no signal of it in clinical examination," he said. Still, these tools are very expensive and thus impractical in the clinical setting, Figueiredo said. "If researchers plan a study refeeding patients very early (patients with no obvious signal of malnutrition) instead of patients diagnosed late, we could demonstrate that nutritional therapy would be a very important supportive therapy for these patients," he said. 1. Florez DA, Aranda-Michel J. Nutritional management of
acute and chronic liver disease. Semin Gastrointest Dis 2002
Jul;13(3):169-78. John Martin is a long-time health journalist and an editor for Priority Healthcare. His credits include coverage of health news for the website of Fox Television's The Health Network, and articles for the New York Post and other consumer and trade publications. http://www.hepatitisneighborhood.com/content/in_the_news/archive_2247.aspx Short-Term Celebrex Safe Against Cirrhosis One expert advised caution for longer-term use, however
By Amanda Gardner
WEDNESDAY, Feb. 23 (HealthDay News) -- A ray of hope may be emerging for the makers of cox-2 inhibitors, the class of drugs under such intense scrutiny at last week's government hearings. A new study finds the cox-2 drug Celebrex may be safe and effective to use on a short-term basis in patients with stable cirrhosis of the liver. The news comes less than a week after a U.S. Food and Drug Administration advisory panel recommended the cox-2 drugs stay on the market -- but with the addition of a black-box label warning of potential cardiovascular risks. "This study provides an important, potential niche usage for selective cox-2 inhibitors in people with chronic liver diseases, based on their better safety profile in very short term use versus non-selective NSAIDs," said Dr. Scott Friedman, chief of the division of liver disease at Mount Sinai School of Medicine in New York City. Friedman was not involved with the study, which appears in the March issue of the journal Hepatology. Forbes magazine reported this week that Celebrex's manufacturer, Pfizer, Inc., is planning a study to compare Celebrex's safety profile with another anti-inflammatory pill. According to the magazine, that other pill is likely to be naproxen (Aleve) -- the same drug Celebrex is pitted against in the cirrhosis study. These moves may signal a change in Pfizer's handling of Celebrex, as the company moves away from previous trials that attempted to prove the drug's superiority to other products in protecting the heart. Instead, according to the Forbes article, it now appears the company may be satisfied with trials aimed at proving Celebrex simply poses no greater cardiovascular risk than its rivals. Members of the FDA advisory panel did indicate that the black box could be removed from Celebrex labeling if future trials showed a favorable safety profile. This latest study in Hepatology focuses on a whole new safety issue, however: kidney problems. The drugs known as nonsteroidal anti-inflammatories have long been associated with kidney failure in patients with cirrhosis of the liver. But there's been some evidence indicating that cox-2 inhibitors -- a subclass within the category of NSAIDs -- may be exempt from this problem. In their study, the researchers from Barcelona's Hospital Clinic compared Celebrex with the traditional NSAID naproxen and a placebo in 28 patients with cirrhosis of the liver. Cirrhosis, which is often linked to excessive drinking, occurs when scar tissue impedes normal liver function. All the study participants were randomly assigned to receive five doses of Celebrex, naproxen or placebo over a period of five days. The final analysis was based on data from 18 individuals. Based on this short-term data, Celebrex turned out to be safer than naproxen, having no effect on kidney function. Regardless, experts still advise caution. "Most physicians and patients also recognize that these drugs, whether they're selective or non-selective, should only be given when absolutely indicated," Friedman said. The long-term effects of the drugs are still an open question and the study authors did acknowledge the need for more research in this area. "They did not assess long-term safety, but if there was a clear indication for a cox-2 for short-term use -- for example, patients who had musculoskeletal or orthopedic issues that required short-term treatment -- the data would suggest that a cox-2 would be safer than a traditional NSAID," Friedman said. Also, all of the patients in the study had very stable disease, he added. "It would not be appropriate to extrapolate this to the use of cox-2 selective antagonists in patients with more advanced liver disease," Friedman said. "These patients had stable cirrhosis and were otherwise healthy." The data, Friedman added, is not really all that surprising since prior animal studies had indicated that the kidney problems associated with NSAIDs were attributable to the blockage of the cox-1 enzyme rather than the cox-2 enzyme. Traditional NSAIDs such as naproxen block both enzymes, while the cox-2 inhibitors, as their name suggests, block only the cox-2 variant. More information The National Institutes of Health (digestive.niddk.nih.gov ) has more on cirrhosis of the liver.
SOURCES: Scott Friedman, M.D., Fishberg professor of medicine, and chief, division of liver disease, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York City; March 2005 Hepatology Copyright © 2005 ScoutNews, LLC. All rights reserved. Last updated 2/23/2005. This article can be accessed directly
at:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Review May 18 2005