|
Viral Kinetics Can
Predict Sustained Viral Response to Treatment with Pegasys and
Ribavirin, independent of Genotype, as Early as 1 or 4 Weeks of
Treatment
Early Hepatitis C viral (HCV) kinetics was previously shown to
predict sustained virological response (SVR). The current
consensus stopping rule is defined at 12 weeks of treatment with
peginterferon-alfa and ribavirin. Earlier prediction is needed
in order to improve the cost/effect ratio. However, the
predictive value of earlier viral kinetics for the current
standard of care has not yet been established.
The DITTO-HCV European funded project is for now the largest
study of frequent early viral kinetics during therapy with
peginterferon-alfa and ribavirin. The researchers aim to
optimize viral kinetics prediction criteria in order to enable
stopping or tailoring treatment as early as possible.
Primary objectives: 1) negative predictive value (NPV) as close
as possible to 100% (thus minimalizing stopped patients with
missed SVR), 2) high specificity (thus increasing the fraction
of patients that can be safely stopped). 3) a high positive
predictive value (PPV) using the same criteria.
134 chronically HCV infected naïve patients received
peginterferon-alfa-2a (40KD) (Pegasys ®) (180 μg qw) plus
ribavirin (Copegus ®) (1000-1200 mg qd) for 48 weeks. Of those,
67%, 28%, 4% and 1% had HCV genotype 1, 2-3, 4 or 5
respectively. Viral kinetics were measured according to
centralized serum HCV RNA quantifications on days 0, 1, 4, 7, 8,
15, 22 and 29 (Cobas Amplicor® HCV Monitor v2,
Roche). SVR was defined as undetectable serum HCV RNA (<50 IU/ml)
after 24 weeks of follow-up post treatment. The early viral
response prediction criteria (EVR) and thresholds tested here
(see Table 1 below) were prospectively defined.
Study
Results
The overall SVR rate was 64%. The EVR studied, together with
their NPV, PPV, specificity (SP), statistical significance and
number of HCV-RNA quantifications needed (NSMP), are given in
Table 1 below.
TABLE 1
|
EVR criteria definitions |
Week |
NSMP |
NPV |
SP |
PPV |
P |
N |
Week-12
(HCV RNA negative
and/or decline >2 log at week 12) |
12 |
2 |
100% |
21% |
68% |
0.001 |
128 |
2nd-slope
(2nd-slope at days 8-15-22-29
faster than 0.3 log/wk) |
4 |
3-5 |
<90% |
<40% |
<74% |
0.001 |
128 |
DITTO-2nd-slope
(combination of rapid slope between
days 8-29 and/or days 15-29) |
4 |
4 |
100% |
34% |
72% |
0.001 |
128 |
Week-1-decline
(Decline > 0.5 log at day 1, 4 or 7) |
1 |
2 |
<71% |
<37% |
<72% |
0.001 |
127 |
Week-1-VL
(VL < 5.5 log at day 1, 4 or 7) |
1 |
2 |
<77% |
<30% |
<70% |
0.004 |
127 |
DITTO-1st-week
(VL < 5.5 log on day 4
and/or decline > 0.5 log at day 7) |
1 |
3 |
100% |
28% |
70% |
0.001 |
127 |
The EVR-w12 criteria has good NPV (100%) but its specificity is
low (21%), thus relatively few non-responders can be stopped.
None of the simple 2nd-slope or Week-1 criteria shows NPV higher
than 90%, thus not adequate for a stopping rule.
A new composite criteria (DITTO-2nd-slp) gives NPV=100% and
specificity=34% already after 4 weeks of treatment. Furthermore,
another new composite criteria (DITTO-1st-week) also gives NPV=100%
with specificity=28% already after 1 week.
Although
composite, these new criteria are simple to calculate and
necessitate only 1 or 2 more viral quantifications compared to
the current Week-12 criteria. Thus allowing to lower the mean
cost by 2410 USD per patient. Note that SVR (56% for gen 1 and
87% for gen 2-3) is predicted independently of genotype.
Moreover, by selecting more strict thresholds for the
DITTO-1st-week (e.g. 4.5 log at day 4 and 2 log decline at day
7) and DITTO-2nd-slope (e.g, 0.6 log/week) criteria one can
obtain higher PPV up to 90%.
Conclusions:
Sustained viral response to treatment with peginterferon-alfa-2a
(40KD) and ribavirin can be predicted, independent of genotype,
as early as 1 or 4 weeks of treatment by new composite, but
still simple and practical, criteria of viral kinetics. Similar
NPV and PPV and better specificity was obtained here by the
DITTO-1st-week or DITTO-2nd-slope prediction criteria, giving
rise to significantly lower cost/effect as compared to the
current stopping rule at 12 weeks. These results warrant future
prospective testing in larger trials, since they can give rise
to considerable saving in cost and quality of life related to
over-treatment or alternatively allow early tailoring of
treatment.
Discussion
Can the new
predictive criteria move the current 12- week stopping rule to
under a month?
The DITTO-HCV
study retrospectively identified two new criteria to classify
rapid viral responders and predict the likely treatment outcome.
For the DITTO-1st week criterion viral levels are
measured at baseline and two times in the first week of
treatment; while the DITTO-2nd slope criterion uses
three measurements of viral levels between the second and fourth
week of treatment.
“Both of these
new criteria predicted who was and who was not likely to respond
to treatment more accurately than the existing 12-week stopping
rule. We had obtained 100 per cent negative predictive value (NPV)
and 90 per cent positive predictive value (PPV) with these
criteria” said
Professor
Avidan
Neumann, from the Bar-Ilan University, Israel, and the DITTO-HCV
study coordinator who presented the study results at an oral
session at AASLD.
Using these
criteria for stopping treatment in patients predicted early on
not to respond will make treatment more cost-effective, even
considering the added cost of the extra measurements of viral
load.
“This is
good news for patients and physicians. Using these new
criteria, we will be able to very early, identify more of those
patients who will ultimately not achieve an SVR so we can advise
them to stop taking their medication, thus improving their
quality of life,” said
Professor
Neumann.
“We now know
that tailoring treatment according to viral kinetics cannot
improve SVR rates with the treatment choices we have at the
moment. However, by measuring viral levels earlier in
treatment, a test physicians are already familiar with, we can
likely move the stopping rule currently defined at week 12 down
to week 4 or even week 1 and avoid having patients who will not
achieve an SVR being treated unnecessarily. These novel
prediction algorithms will hopefully be confirmed soon by other
clinical trials and their feasibility in clinical practice will
be assessed, thus allowing us to optimize the treatment of
hepatitis C patients," concluded Prof. Neumann.
10/27/03
Reference
AU Neumann and others. EARLY VIRAL KINETICS PREDICTION OF
SUSTAINED VIROLOGICAL RESPONSE AFTER 1 OR 4 WEEKS OF
PEG-INTERFERON-ALFA-2A AND RIBAVIRIN THERAPY (DITTO-HCV
PROJECT).
A Comparison of Standard Treatment
Versus Dynamically Individualized Treatment in Patients with
Chronic Hepatitis C
Combination therapy with peginterferon alfa and ribavirin for 48
weeks achieves sustained virologic response rates (SVR) of
54-61% in patients with chronic hepatitis C. However, the SVR
rates are highly variable according to baseline (HCV genotype)
and on-treatment parameters (initial viral decline). Thus, it
must be anticipated that current standard therapy
recommendations lead to under-treatment in some and
over-treatment in other individual patients.
Comparison between a dynamically individualized treatment
schedule according to the early virologic response versus the
standard of care combination therapy with peginterferon alfa-2a
(40KD) (Pegasys) (PEG-IFN) (180 μg qw) plus ribavirin (Copegus)
(RBV) (1000-1200 mg qd) for 48 weeks.
The primary aim of the study was to increase SVR, while
optimizing the available drugs, treatment duration, quality of
life and the socio-economical burden of therapy. The secondary
aim of the study was to enable a comprehensive analysis of
viral/host/immune correlates of response to treatment (ongoing).
All patients (n=273) were initially treated with PEG-IFN/RBV for
6 weeks and initial viral kinetics were defined according to
centralized serum HCV RNA quantifications (Cobas Amplicor HCV
Monitor v2, Roche Molecular Systems) on baseline and days 0, 1,
4, 7, 8, 15, 22 and 29.
After classification into viral response categories at 6 weeks,
patients were randomized (n=270) to individualized therapy (arms
A1, A2, B1, B2, C, D) or continuation of standard therapy (STD
arm). Treatment tailoring included: in rapid viral responders (RVR)
- discontinuation of RBV (A1) or shortening of treatment
duration to 24 weeks (A2); in slow partial responders (SPR) -
addition of histamine (B1) or prolongation of treatment to 72
weeks (B2); in flat partial responders (FPR) - addition of
histamine (C); in null responders (NUR) - retreatment with
high-dose of PEG-IFN (360 μg qw) plus RBV (D). SVR was defined
as undetectable serum HCV RNA (< 50 IU/ml) at the end of 24
weeks of untreated follow-up.
Study Results
Demographic and baseline virologic parameters were similar in
the standard and the individualized treatment groups. According
to the initial viral decline patients were categorized as RVR
(51% for genotype 1 and 94% for genotype 2-3), SPR (35% and 5%
accordingly), FPR (5% and 0% accordingly), NUR (10% and 1%
accordingly) or unclassified (1%). The overall SVR rates for
genotype 1 patients were 49% for the individualized and 56% for
the standard treatment arm (NS), and for genotype 2-3 patients
90% and 87% respectively (NS). SVR rates (by ITT analysis)
according to HCV genotype and within each initial viral response
category and arm are given in Table 1 below.
Table 1
| |
Rapid responders
(RVR) |
Slow responders
(SPR) |
Flat responders
(FPR) |
Null responders
(NUR) |
|
Genotype |
A1 |
A2 |
STD |
B1 |
B2 |
STD |
C |
STD |
D |
STD |
HCV-1
|
79% |
65% |
79% |
0% |
46% |
40% |
20% |
0% |
10% |
10% |
HCV-2,3
|
89% |
95% |
89% |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
Conclusions
The overall sustained virologic response rates of 53% in
genotype 1 and 88% in genotype 2-3 patients with chronic
hepatitis C treated with Pegasys (peginterferon alfa-2a/40KD) in
combination with ribavirin support previously presented data.
Individualized treatment according to initial viral kinetics
appears to be clinically feasible, but did not improve the
sustained virologic response rate with the drugs and dosages
usable at the time of this study.
Nevertheless, the possibility that in rapid viral responders
discontinuation of ribavirin does not decrease the sustained
virologic response rate warrants future prospective trials.
Discussion
Rapid Viral
Responders Have Most Promising Results
Rapid viral
responders were prospectively defined as patients whose HCV RNA
declined by at least 99 per cent during the first month of
treatment. The study found that in this sub-group, even the most
difficult-to-treat genotype 1 patients could achieve 83% SVR.
A relatively
high SVR rate (71%) was obtained even for the rapid responding
patients treated with ribavirin for only the first 6 weeks
instead of the standard regimen of ribavirin during the whole
peginterferon treatment of 48 weeks. These SVR rates are similar
to that achieved by genotype 2/3 patients (88%), who
traditionally have been easier to treat.
“It is
therefore critical for these rapid responding patients to be
identified” said Professor
Zeuzem.
Supported by the European Community (QLK2-2000-00836), Hoffmann
La-Roche and Maxim Pharmaceuticals.
10/24/03
References
S Zeuzem and
others (for the The DITTO-HCV study--Dynamically Individualized
Treatment of Hepatitis C Infection and
Correlates of Viral/Host Dynamics study).
INTERNATIONAL, MULTICENTER, RANDOMIZED, CONTROLLED STUDY
COMPARING STANDARD VERSUS DYNAMICALLY INDIVIDUALIZED TREATMENT
IN PATIENTS WITH CHRONIC HEPATITIS C (DITTO-HCV PROJECT).
Abstract 317 (poster). 54th AASLD.
October 24-28, 2003. Boston, MA.
Multivariate Models Predict Outcome of Therapy
for HCV at Baseline and at Weeks 4 and 8
Given the current burden of hepatitis C virus (HCV) therapy,
physicians have been seeking a reliable early stopping rule for
patients undergoing pegylated combination therapy who will be
non-responders.
French researchers used data from 174 chronically infected HCV
patients to develop multivariate models (MM) to predict
non-response (NR), sustained response (SR) and relapse (RR) from
information available in the first 8 weeks of therapy. They
compared information from univariate models (UMs), based solely
on quantitative or qualitative HCV RNA information, with that
derived from MMs.
174 chronically infected HCV patients (94 treatment
naïve and 80 previously failed) were treated with PEG-Intron (pegylated
interferon alfa-2b) 1.5 mg/kg/week plus ribavirin 800-1200
mg/day. Naïve genotype 1 or 4 patients and previously failed
patients were treated for 48 weeks; patients with HCV genotype
2, 3, or 5, for 24 weeks.
SR was defined as undetectable HCV RNA by the VERSANTR
HCV RNA Qualitative Assay (TMA) (Bayer Diagnostics) at
end-of-treatment (EOT) and follow-up at week 24 (FU 24). Serum
HCV RNA was quantified by the VERSANTR HCV RNA 3.0
Assay (bDNA) (Bayer Diagnostics); at baseline, weeks 4, 8, EOT,
and FU24. If the HCV RNA concentration was below 615 IU/mL,
specimens were then tested by HCV Qual (TMA) (limit of detection
≤ 9.6 IU/mL.)
Univariate models:
Baseline UM utilized a prediction threshold of 6.14 log10
copies/mL to predict outcome. Week 4 and 8 UM used a 2 log10
drop rule ( ≥ or < 2 log drop in viral load from baseline;
UM2 log) or clearance of virus or lack thereof by the HCV Qual (TMA)
(UM TMA).
Multivariate models:
MM employ ordinal regression with similarity least squares
technology to assign a given outcome to the highest probability
of response. Different numbers of "critical patients" (n= 33-57)
were used to derive the models using design of experiment and
functional techniques for each time point; the models were then
tested on the remaining patients (n >110). Model variables
included: HCV RNA concentrations at baseline and weeks 4 and 8,
gender, age, baseline ALT, inflammatory and fibrosis scores,
genotype and treatment status (naïve or previous therapy).
Study Results
The comparative sensitivity specificity, positive and negative
predictive values (PPV and NPV) at for the UMs and MMs are shown
in the table below. Baseline and week 4 models combined NRs and
RRs into non-responder group, whereas week 8 model correctly
separated SRs, RRs, and NRs.
Prediction of SR or NR At Baseline and Weeks 4 and 8 of Therapy
-
percent of
SR identified by model; 2 percent of non-responders identified
by model; 3 percent of SR predicted by model who are true SR;
4 percent of NR predicted by model who are true NR; 5 ≥ or
<6.14 log10 c/mL; 6 ≥ or < 2 log10
change in c/mL; 7 HCV RNA detected or not detected by TMA.
Conclusions:
At each time point, the multivariate models demonstrates greater
sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV than do the univariate
models. Multivariate models can identify SR and non SR (NR and
RR as one group) at baseline and week 4. By week 8 multivariate
models can correctly identify SR, RR, and NR.
The 100% prediction of non-response by the multivariate model at
week 8 with the 97% NPV of < a 2 log drop suggests a week 8
stopping rule could be employed.
Time point |
Model |
Sensitivity1 |
Specificity2 |
PPV
3 |
NPV4 |
|
Baseline |
UM5 |
37/97 = 38.1% |
66/77 = 85.7% |
37/48 = 77.1% |
66/126 = 52.4% |
| |
MM |
63/63 = 100% |
60/60 = 100% |
63/63 =100% |
60/60 = 100% |
|
Week 4 |
UM 2 log6 |
88/97 =90.7% |
49/77 = 63.6% |
88/116 = 75.9% |
49/58 = 84.5% |
| |
UM TMA7 |
40/97 = 41.2% |
74/77 = 96.1% |
40/43 = 93.0% |
74/131 = 56.5% |
|
MM |
82/82 = 100% |
59/59 = 100% |
82/82 = 100% |
59/59 = 100% |
|
Week 8 |
UM. 2 log |
96/97 = 99.0% |
31/75 = 41.3% |
96/140 = 68.6% |
31/32 = 96.9% |
| |
UM TMA |
72/97 = 74.2% |
67/75 = 89.3% |
72/80 = 90% |
67/92 = 72.8% |
|
MM |
74/74 = 100% |
36/36 = 100% |
74/74 = 100% |
36/36 = 100% |
11/07/03
Reference
M Martinot-Peignoux and others. MULTIVARIATE MODELS PREDICT
OUTCOME TO HEPATITIS C VIRUS THERAPY AT BASELINE AND AT WEEKS 4
AND 8. Abstract 1215 (poster).
54th
Annual Meeting of the American Association for the Study of
Liver Diseases. October 24-28, 2003. Boston, MA.
HIV-HCV Coinfection Status Does Not Affect HCV
Viral Kinetic Response to Interferon
Viral kinetic modeling of HCV response to interferon-based
therapy provides important insights into factors associated with
treatment outcomes. HIV-HCV coinfected patients appear to have
lower overall response rates than that observed in monoinfected
subjects, but the reason for this is not clear. This research
group speculated that kinetic responses in key parameters would
be decreased in coinfected subjects.
HIV-HCV coinfected patients and HCV monoinfected patients
prospectively matched for treatment, genotype, age (+ 5
yrs), gender, race, and histology were evaluated.
Coinfected patients were randomized within the context of a
large U.S. multicenter trial (ACTG 5071) to receive Pegasys (pegylated
interferon alfa-2a) + ribavirin vs. Roferon (interferon alfa-2a)
+ ribavirin. Quantitative HCV RNA (Roche COBAS AMPLICOR) kinetic
testing was performed at 0, 6, 12, 24, 48, and 72 hours and at
days 7, 14. Non-linear regression and linear models were
evaluated in an effort to best predict response and identify
prognostic factors.
Study Results
Twenty-seven subjects underwent viral kinetic sampling and
evaluation. These included twelve HIV-HCV case subjects (10 men,
2 women) and 15 matched HCV controls (some patients
double-matched).
The mean age of coinfected subjects was 46.1 years (range,
38-60). Among HIV+ subjects the mean CD4+ count was 325 cells/mm3
(range, 175-855). 11/12 had baseline HIV RNA <400
copies/ml. Mean HCV viral load was 6.6 log IU/ml among
coinfected vs. 6.2 log IU/ml in controls.
75% of coinfected subjects had HCV genotype 1. The remainder
were genotype 2. Twenty-five (25%) of coinfected patients had no
detectable virus 24 weeks after completion of 48 weeks of
therapy (SVR).
Overall SVR in control subjects was 46.6%. Efficiency (ε) of
Phase 1 response (λ) slope at 72 hours, lambda2
(slope of Phase 2 decline) were calculated (see table below).
TREATMENT
|
ε |
λ2 |
p |
PEG-IFN + riba
Case/Control |
88.6%/84.8% |
.008/.051 |
n.s. |
IFN + riba
Case/Control |
58.4%/65.3% |
.129/.091 |
n.s. |
|
P< 0.05 for PEG-IFN vs. IFN (ε) |
| |
|
|
|
|
Efficiency of clearance (ε) at 72 hours was highly associated
with actual viral clearance across all groups (p=0.001) but λ2
was not. Regression analysis failed to demonstrate a
relationship between ε and baseline CD4+ count, HCV viral load
or genotype. In contrast, #955;2 was significantly
associated with genotype.
Viral kinetic parameters were not predictive of SVR.
Conclusions
-
Viral
kinetic modeling demonstrated that the efficiency of clearance
at 72 hours was significantly associated with viral clearance
during treatment;
-
Coinfection
status did not affect key kinetic parameters;
-
PEG-IFN was
superior to standard interferon in terms of viral clearance
efficiency, particularly in the coinfected group; and
-
Diminished SVR in coinfected patients may be related to
immune factors that are operative after reduction of viral
loads to undetectable levels.
11/10/03
Reference
KE Sherman and others. MODELING HCV VIRAL KINETIC RESPONSE TO
PEG-IFN/RIBAVIRIN IN HCV-HIV COINFECTED PATIENTS. Abstract 315
(poster).
54th
Annual Meeting of the American Association for the Study of
Liver Diseases. October 24-28, 2003. Boston, MA.
|