54th Annual Meeting of
The American Association for
the Study of Liver Diseases
October 24, 28- 2003
Boston, Massachusetts
Page One
HIV-HCV Coinfection
|
|
The Liver Meeting |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Efficacy of Pegasys vs Pegasys Plus Ribavirin in HIV-HCV Coinfected Patients Who Are Nonresponders to Prior Interferon Therapy 10/27/03 Host Factors Responsible for a Viral Response May Be Different in Responders Compared with Nonresponders and Independent of Serum PEG-Intron Concentrations 10/27/03
HIV-HBV Coinfected Patients Show Sustained Suppression of
Epivir-HBV-resistant HBV Through 3 Years of Treatment with Hepsera
10/29/03 HIV-HCV Coinfection Status Does Not Affect HCV Viral Kinetic Response to Interferon 11/10/03 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Efficacy of Pegasys vs Pegasys Plus Ribavirin in HIV-HCV
Coinfected Patients Who Are Nonresponders to Prior Interferon Therapy HCV co-infection is common among patients with HIV disease. It has been documented that HIV co-infection accelerates the course of liver disease in patients with HCV, and that liver failure is higher in co-infected patients.
At this
moment, there is no effective treatment for HCV non-responders to interferon
therapy. Interferon monotherapy and interferon-ribavirin combination is only
effective in 2-3% and 5-10% interferon-resistant patients respectively.
Treatment strategies to slow the progression to cirrhosis and to prevent
liver failure in this population are needed.
This report
examines the efficacy of Peg IFN alfa 2-a (Pegasys) vs Pegasys/RBV 800mg in
co-infected HCV/HIV patients that have not responded to a previous 6-12
months course IFN-alfa. The study also examines the histological benefit of
treatment in this population. All similar responders (group 2) continue treatment for a total of 48 weeks. Baseline demographics were similar between both groups. More than 70% of patients were nonresponders to IFN monotherapy. Most patients in both groups (80%) were genotype 1. The mean HIV baseline log was 2.92 (SD .64) group 1, vs 2.85 (SD .57) group 2 and most patients had baseline CD4 levels >400 cells, and were in stable antiretroviral therapy. The majority of patients (81%) are non cirrhotic, with mean grading group 1 6.63 (SD 3.24), group 2 7 (SD 3.64), and mean staging, group 1 3.51 (SD 2.2), and group 2 3.48 (SD 1.70).
Results ConclusionsSustained virological response (SVR) (Intention to treat), will be of the order of 5-20%. (11 group 2 results are pending). In this study, 10 patients were discontinued because of adverse events and 10 were lost to follow up, before week 24. SVR in patients that completed at least 24 weeks of therapy will be of the order of 7-26%. A significant number of end of treatment responders have relapsed at week 72. Histology analysis shows improvement in both groups of the mean grading and staging after treatment. In responders and relapsers the FPR becomes static or regressive. These results show that Pegasys /RBV therapy is effective in this population. The study also suggests that longer duration of therapy and higher doses of RBV should be studied in coinfected nonresponders 10/27/03
Reference
Host Factors Responsible for a Viral Response May Be
Different in Responders Compared with Nonresponders and Independent of Serum
PEG-Intron Concentrations Approximately one half of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infected patients will fail to respond to current treatment regimens, pegylated interferon alfa and ribavirin. Modeling of HCV RNA decay in response to antiviral therapy can provide insight into viral and host determinants of viral response. Pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, and immunologic outcomes were evaluated on 24 co-infected patients in order to: 1) evaluate the relationship between HCV RNA decay and PEG-IFN alfa2b serum concentrations in HIV/HCV co-infected patients and 2) Evaluate association between HCV-specific immune responses and virologic outcome. 24 co-infected, therapy-naïve patients were treated with PEG-IFN alfa2b 1.5μg/kg/wk and RBV 13 ± 2 mg/kg/day. Serum was obtained for HCV RNA, HIV-1 RNA and serum PEG-IFN alfa2b levels at baseline, after the first dose (6, 12, 24 hours) and on days 2, 3, 5, 6; after the second dose (6, 12, 24 hours) and on days 8, 9; and after the third dose on days 14, 15, and 16. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells were obtained at baseline, weekly for the first month, and monthly thereafter. HCV and HIV-1 RNA levels were determined by reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction and PEG-IFN alfa2b levels were measured by ELISA. CD4+ cell proliferative responses to HCV antigens (core, NS3, NS4, NS5) and HIV-1 gag were performed at baseline, day 7 and 14, and weeks 4, 8, 12, and 24. Among 24 co-infected patients, 21 are males, the mean age was 46 ± 5.8 years, 8 are Caucasian, 12 are African-American and 4 are Hispanic. 20/24 patients were infected with genotype 1, 3/24 patients with genotype 2, and 1/24 with genotype 3a. Study Results Pharmacokinetics: To date, 21 patients have been evaluated. 10/21 patients were end of treatment responders, but 2 of these were “late responders” (i.e. HCV RNA declines after week 8 and is undetectable by week 24). Data fitting during the first seven days revealed a free virion clearance rate c of 13.3 (day-1) and an infected cell clearance rate δ of 0.21 (day-1). The half-lives were 2.7 hours and 4.0 days, respectively. Pharmacodynamics: Viron production was blocked after the first dose of PEG-IFN alfa with an average maximum effectiveness (εmax ) of 89%. We estimated that the fifty percent effective concentration (EC50) of PEG-IFN alfa2b, the theoretical in vivo drug concentration at which the drug efficacy is 50%, was five-fold lower in responders compared with non-responders while the maximum (Cmax) and minimum (Cmin) concentrations did not differ significantly (Table I). The calculated minimum (εmin) and maximum (εmax) efficacy were also significantly increased in responders. Immunologic: The mean number of CD4+, CD8+ and CD56+ cells did not differ significantly at baseline or during treatment between responders and nonresponders. Peripheral blood CD4+ HCV-specific proliferative responses did not differ significantly between responders and nonresponders except that the response to core antigen was increased in non-responders compared with responders at weeks 4 and 12. HIV gag CD4+ proliferative responses were stronger than HCV-specific responses at all time points evaluated.
Conclusions The serum PEG-IFN alfa2b concentration necessary for an end of treatment response is five-fold lower in responders compared with non-responders while there are no significant differences in the maximum and minimum PEG-IFN alfa-2b concentrations in responders and nonresponders. These data suggest that host factors responsible for a viral response may be different in responders compared with nonresponders, independent of serum PEG-IFN alfa2b concentrations.
Supported by the NIH and conducted at Weill Medical College of Cornell, NY, Los Alamos National Laboratory and New York Blood Center. 10/27/03
Reference
HIV-HBV Coinfected Patients Show Sustained Suppression of Epivir-HBV-resistant HBV Through 3 Years of Treatment with Hepsera Gilead Sciences today (10/28/03) announced that treatment with its once daily, oral antiviral agent Hepsera (adefovir dipivoxil 10 mg) was associated with sustained reductions in levels of hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA through 144 weeks (approximately three years) among patients chronically infected with Epivir-HBV (lamivudine)-resistant HBV and co-infected with HIV. Data from the single-center, open-label clinical trial (Study 460i) were presented today at the 54th AASLD by Yves Benhamou, MD, Service d’Hépato-Gastroentérologie, Groupe Hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France. This presentation is one of eight Hepsera-related abstracts featured at the conference. “Patients co-infected with HIV and HBV can be difficult to treat. The development of resistance – which emerges in up to 90 percent of immunocompromised HBV-infected patients after four years of therapy with lamivudine – can lead to progression of chronic hepatitis B,” said Dr. Benhamou. “In this study, co-infected patients who received Hepsera showed sustained suppression of HBV through nearly three years of therapy.” About Study 460i Gilead released the following information about study 460i: “Study 460i is a single-center, open-label study of Hepsera in chronic hepatitis B patients with lamivudine-resistant HBV and co-infected with HIV. The study enrolled 35 patients with controlled HIV infection (mean baseline HIV RNA serum level of 2.88 log10 copies/mL by Roche Amplicor Monitor PCR) who were receiving lamivudine 150 mg twice daily as part of their combination anti-HIV treatment regimen for a median of 42.3 months prior to enrollment. “Lamivudine-resistant HBV (confirmed “YMDD” mutation) was detected in patients a median of 21.3 months prior to initiating treatment with Hepsera. The median baseline serum HBV DNA level in these patients was 8.75 log10 copies/mL (Roche Amplicor™ Monitor PCR). “Hepsera was associated with a significant and progressive change from baseline in median serum HBV DNA levels after 144 weeks of treatment: -5.45 log10 copies/mL (n=29; p<0.001) at week 144, compared with -4.0 log10 copies/mL at week 48 and -4.8 log10 copies/mL at week 96. “Approximately 46 percent of patients had undetectable HBV DNA levels (<3.0 log10 copies/mL) after nearly three years of therapy. By week 144, two patients had experienced HBeAg seroconversion. “Levels of serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) – a measure of liver damage – also continued to decrease toward normal values throughout the study. At 144 weeks, 61 percent of patients had normal ALT levels. The median ALT was 31 IU/L, a further improvement from 96 weeks (46 IU/L), 48 weeks (53 IU/L) and a significant decline from the pre-study value (81 IU/L; p<0.001). “There were a total of three serious adverse events reported, all of which were determined to be unrelated to study drug. Two patients with transient changes in serum creatinine (³0.5 mg/dL increases from baseline) were reported, both events resolved on continued treatment, and no patients had serum phosphorus levels less than 1.5 mg/dL, both laboratory markers of renal function. No adefovir-associated HBV resistance mutations (rtN236T) related to Hepsera treatment were identified through week 144.” About Hepsera Hepsera, the first nucleotide analogue for chronic hepatitis B, is administered as a once-daily 10 mg tablet and works by blocking HBV DNA polymerase, an enzyme involved in the replication of the virus in the body. In clinical trials and expanded access programs, approximately 7,000 patients have been treated with Hepsera for periods of up to three years. Hepsera is now available in the United States, the United Kingdom, France, Germany, Portugal, Ireland, Greece, Spain, Norway, Austria and Sweden. In April 2002, Gilead signed a licensing agreement with GlaxoSmithKline (GSK), granting GSK rights to commercialize Hepsera in Asia, Latin America and other territories. In the United States, Hepsera is indicated for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B in adults with evidence of active viral replication and either evidence of persistent elevations in serum aminotransferases (ALT or AST) or histologically active disease. 10/29/03
Reference
Report Confirms Safety of Liver Transplantation in HIV-HCV Co-infected Patients Although liver transplantation in patients with HIV infection in the era of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) has been successful, some have reported significant graft loss in patients with hepatitis C due to its aggressive recurrence post transplant. In a report presented at the 54th AASLD, authors reported the clinical outcomes of hepatitis C recurrence and treatment in 15 patients who underwent liver transplantation between March, 1997 and the present. Of the 15 patients, 3 were excluded because of early deaths (<30 days) due to sepsis (2 patients) or primary non-function. The 12 remaining patients had a mean follow-up of 22.1 months (1.4 - 57.3 months). Four patients have died, with 1 each succumbing to hepatocellular carcinoma, chronic rejection, overwhelming fungal sepsis, and bacterial pneumonia. Two of these patients had biopsy-proven hepatitis C including 1 who developed cirrhosis despite interferon-α and ribavirin. Of the 8 patients who are alive – 4 of whom are currently on treatment, three with Pegylated-interferon/ribavirin – 7 have biopsy-proven recurrent hepatitis C diagnosed at a mean time of 6.7 ± 2.4 months after their transplant. Histologically, the only patient who cleared HCV still progressed to cirrhosis. All of the patients currently alive have CD4 counts greater than 200 and undetectable HIV viral loads. The authors conclude: “Liver transplantation in patients co-infected with HIV and HCV is a successful therapeutic option. We have not had any rapid or aggressive courses of recurrent hepatitis C leading to allograft failure. “Thus far, these patients have been able to tolerate treatment and they appear to have a similar short-term response as compared to HCV patients without HIV. It remains to be seen whether HIV and immunosuppression will significantly hasten HCV recurrence with longer follow-ups.” 10/29/03
Reference
GB Virus C (GBV-C) Clearance Is Frequent in HIV-HCV Coinfected Patients Receiving Interferon and Ribavirin and Does Not Elevate HIV RNA Levels Co-infection with the flavivirus GB virus C (GBV-C) has recently been shown to have a beneficial effect on the course of HIV disease progression. While previous studies have demonstrated an inverse relationship between levels of HIV-1 RNA and GBV-C RNA, it is not known what effect clearance of GBV-C has on HIV-1 RNA levels and disease control.
Researchers
in the Adult ACTG A5071 Study Group investigated the prevalence of GBV-C
infection in a large cohort of HIV-HCV co-infected subjects and the effect
of interferon (IFN) + ribavirin (RBV) combination treatment on GBV-C
replication. We also evaluated the effect of GBV-C clearance on HIV-1 RNA
levels. The investigators retrospectively studied 131 HIV-HCV co-infected subjects who were enrolled in the AIDS Clinical Trials Group (ACTG) A5071 trial, a multicenter randomized trial evaluating the efficacy of IFN α-2a + RBV or PEG-IFNα-2a + RBV treatment for HCV infection in individuals co-infected with HIV. GBV-C viremia was detected by nested RT-PCR and quantified by real-time PCR from stored sera at baseline and treatment week 24. In some patients who continued treatment beyond week 24 for a total of 48 weeks (HCV virologic responders and histologic responders among HCV virologic nonresponders), additional sera from weeks 48 and 72 were available for analysis. HIV-1 RNA levels were recorded at corresponding time points.
As markers
of prior GBV-C clearance, serum samples were also tested for GBV-C anti-E2
antibodies. Study ResultsAt baseline, 85% of patients had signs of GBV-C infection: 22% were GBV-C RNA+, 55% were anti-E2+ and 8% were both GBV-C RNA and anti-E2+. There were no differences in HIV-1 RNA or CD4 count between GBV-C RNA+ and RNA- subjects. Of the 40 GBV-C RNA+ subjects, HIV-1 RNA levels were undetectable (<50 copies/mL) in 23 (58%) at entry. 37 (93%) were on active antiretroviral therapy. No subject acquired GBV-C RNA during the study observation period (mean 63 wks). Among the 38 GBV-C RNA+ subjects who completed 24 weeks of IFN + RBV or PEG-IFN + RBV therapy, GBV-C RNA clearance was observed in 17 (45%), without development of anti-E2 antibodies. Among the 21 subjects who were followed up to 72 weeks, sustained clearance of GBV-C RNA was observed in 7 (33%; 18% by intent-to-treat). Entry GBV-C RNA levels were not significantly associated with clearance of GBV-C viremia (p=0.1).
At week 24,
no correlation was observed between GBV-C RNA clearance and rise in HIV-1
RNA levels. Conclusions In a US ACTG clinical trial cohort, (1) remote or active GBV-C infection is extremely common among HIV-HCV co-infected patients; (2) GBV-C viremia was present in 30% of HIV-HCV coinfected patients; (3) GBV-C viremia is cleared in 45% of HIV-HCV/GBV-C triply infected patients after 24 weeks of combination antiviral therapy for HCV; (4) GBV-C sustained virologic response occurs in at least 18% of treated patients with combination antiviral therapy; (5) The clearance of GBV-C RNA is not associated with elevations in HIV-1 RNA. The long-term outcome of this clearance is not known. These findings have important implications for the management of HIV-HCV co-infected persons undergoing IFN-based antiviral therapy. 10/29/03
Reference
HIV-HCV Coinfection Status Does Not Affect HCV Viral
Kinetic Response to Interferon HIV-HCV coinfected patients and HCV monoinfected patients prospectively matched for treatment, genotype, age (+ 5 yrs), gender, race, and histology were evaluated.
Coinfected
patients were randomized within the context of a large U.S. multicenter
trial (ACTG 5071) to receive Pegasys (pegylated interferon alfa-2a) +
ribavirin vs. Roferon (interferon alfa-2a) + ribavirin. Quantitative HCV RNA
(Roche COBAS AMPLICOR) kinetic testing was performed at 0, 6, 12, 24, 48,
and 72 hours and at days 7, 14. Non-linear regression and linear models were
evaluated in an effort to best predict response and identify prognostic
factors. Study ResultsTwenty-seven subjects underwent viral kinetic sampling and evaluation. These included twelve HIV-HCV case subjects (10 men, 2 women) and 15 matched HCV controls (some patients double-matched). The mean age of coinfected subjects was 46.1 years (range, 38-60). Among HIV+ subjects the mean CD4+ count was 325 cells/mm3 (range, 175-855). 11/12 had baseline HIV RNA <400 copies/ml. Mean HCV viral load was 6.6 log IU/ml among coinfected vs. 6.2 log IU/ml in controls. 75% of coinfected subjects had HCV genotype 1. The remainder were genotype 2. Twenty-five (25%) of coinfected patients had no detectable virus 24 weeks after completion of 48 weeks of therapy (SVR). Overall SVR in control subjects was 46.6%. Efficiency (ε) of Phase 1 response (λ) slope at 72 hours, lambda2 (slope of Phase 2 decline) were calculated (see table below).
Viral
kinetic parameters were not predictive of SVR. Conclusions
11/10/03
Reference
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||