This Web Site is committed to the memory of Janis Morrow.

Human liver     

Genotype 2010

Index : Updated News On Treatment According to Genotype

 


March


Genotype 2 Extending Therapy With Peg/Riba

Shorter Treatment for HCV Genotype 1?

PEG-IFN/ribavirin: More Adverse Effects, Worse Adherence in Older HCV-1 Patients


February


Can Some Genotype 1 Chronic Hepatitis C Patients Benefit from Shorter Interferon-based Treatment?

Retreatment Of Chronic Hepatitis C- Genotype 1-Infected Relapsers To Peginterferon/Ribavirin With Consensus Interferon/Ribavirin Or With Extended Duration Therapy Peginterferon/Ribavirin -

Advances in the understanding of HCV infection are fueling the design of novel therapies designed to eradicate all genotypes of HCV.

Hepatitis C Treatment Genotype 1/Telaprevir

Pharmasset Starts Trial of HCV Polymerase Inhibitor PSI-7977 for Genotype 1 Chronic Hepatitis C Patients

 


January


Rapid HCV Response May Permit Shortened Therapy

Genotype 1

Introducing Telaprevir and Boceprevir

More Than 80 Percent of HCV Genotype 1 Treatment-Naive Patients Achieved
Sustained Virologic Response With Twice-Daily Telaprevir-Based Regimen


Rapid HCV Response May Permit Shortened Therapy

NEW YORK (Reuters Health) Jan 01 - In selected patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, a shortened 24-week course of pegylated interferon (PEG IFN) and ribavirin can be considered: those with HCV genotype 1, a rapid decrease in viral load, and low HCV RNA at baseline, according to French researchers.

In the January issue of the Journal of Hepatology, Dr. Christophe Moreno of Hopital Claude Huriez, Lille and colleagues conducted a meta-analysis of 7 randomized controlled trials. Six studies compared 24 and 48 weeks of treatment; the remaining study compared 18 and 48 weeks.

Overall, the studies involved 807 treatment naive patients with HCV-1, rapid viral decline (i.e., a 2-log viral load drop or undetectable HCV RNA) within four weeks of treatment. Four hundred ten patients were treated for 48 weeks and 397 for shorter periods.

Sustained virological response rates were lower (mean difference, 13.6%; p=0.004) when treatment was given for less than 48 weeks. Thus, say the investigators, one SVR "would be lost when 7 patients underwent less than 48 weeks of therapy as compared to the expected rate in the 48-week treatment group."

The relapse rate was also significantly higher among patients treated for less than 48 weeks (mean difference, 9.9%).

However, there was no significant effect of shorter treatment duration on the end-of-treatment virological response rate (mean difference, 1.5%).

Also, in the subgroup of patients with undetectable HCV-RNA at week 4 and a baseline HCV-RNA level of no more than 400,000 IU/mL, there was no significant difference between sustained virological responses after 24 or 48 weeks of treatment.

The researchers conclude that these are the only patients who should be considered for shorter treatment. However, they add, "the optimal cut-off defining low baseline viral load and the impact of the presence of other factors capable of altering treatment response, remain subject to debate."

J Hepatol 2010;52:25-31.


Genotype 1

Telaprevir (with pegylated interferon and ribavirin):  Seems to be the winner on the basis of clinical results and outcomes.  Genotype 1 treatment-naïve:  In 2009 data from various clinical trials of telaprevir, pegylated interferon plus ribavirin (phase II) found that 69% of genotype 1 treatment-naïve patients treated for 24 weeks achieved an SVR.  Re-treatment of people who did not achieve an SVR with a previous course of pegylated interferon plus ribavirin for 48 weeks resulted in SVR rates between 38% and 76% (depending of type of prior non-SVR).  The most prominent side effect was skin rash.  Another study evaluated the current dosing schedule of thrice daily (current phase III studies) and compared it to a twice daily dosing schedule (with the same daily drug exposure).  The twice-a-day dose was found to be as effective as the thrice daily dose.  The implications of the results are not completely clear at this time since all the previous studies and the current phase III studies of telaprevir are using the thrice daily dose. 

http://www.hcvadvocate.org/news/newsLetter/2010/advocate0110.html

Jan 01


Introducing Telaprevir and Boceprevir

The Studies
The introduction of Specifically Targeted Antiviral Therapy (STAT-C)added to peginterferon (PEG-IFN) and ribavirin (RBV) is soon at hand and will offer new treatment opportunities to patients infected with hepatitis C.
The recently released Protease Inhibition for Viral Evaluation(PROVE, evaluating telaprevir) and Serine Protease Inhibitor Therapy (SPRINT, evaluating boceprevir) studies suggest that protease inhibitors in combination with PEG-IFN/RBV can produce sustained viral response rates (SVR) approaching 70% to 75% in genotype 1, treatment-naïve patients and the potential to shorten treatment duration in those with a rapid viral response.
For previous nonresponders and relapsers to interferon (IFN)-based therapies,there is realistic hope for retreatment success (approximately 40% and 75%SVR, respectively, in PROVE data).
In addition, there is early indication that STAT-C drugs may help overcome negative host factors that have historically been associated with poor response rates (such as ethnicity, insulin resistance, steatosis, and cirrhosis).
A small cohort of African Americans included inPROVE-1 had a four-fold higher SVR rate with telaprevir (44% versus 11%), and the presenceof cirrhosis did not negatively impact SVR rates in PROVE-3.Thank you Jules and NATAP

http://www.natap.org/2009/HCV/100809_01.htm


More Than 80 Percent of HCV Genotype 1 Treatment-Naive Patients Achieved
Sustained Virologic Response With Twice-Daily Telaprevir-Based Regimen


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


 

 


copyright © 2003-2008 Janis and Friends Hepatitis C Web Site|  design )by carter

Design downloaded from Zeroweb.org: Free website templates, layouts, and tools.